LEGAL MECHANISMS FOR THE PROTECTION OF PROPERTY EXPECTATIONS IN THE LIGHT OF MODERN LEGAL REFORMS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
Main Article Content
Abstract
The study of legal mechanisms for protecting property expectations is an urgent task for modern legal science, as in the context of reforms and legal uncertainty, guaranteeing expected property rights becomes particularly important. Existing theoretical approaches and law enforcement practice reveal contradictions in the interpretation of the concept of "property expectations" and its relationship to the "legitimate expectations" category used by the European Court of Human Rights. In this regard, there is a need for a comprehensive analysis of legal instruments that ensure an appropriate level of protection of expected property rights. The purpose of the study is to clarify the possibilities of modern legal development in providing adequate protection for property expectations. The work uses the PRISMA methodology to form a sample of scientific sources. The study included 45 sources of various types (monographs, empirical and review articles, conference proceedings), selected according to precise criteria. The chronological framework was 2016–2025. The results showed that regulatory approaches to protecting property expectations are based on the implementation of a set of principles and individual mechanisms. The quantitative ratio of protection instruments was established: 42% of the studied sources emphasize civil law mechanisms, 31% - administrative law, and 27% - judicial mechanisms. The decisions of the ECHR play a significant role, using the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights as an instrument to guarantee property expectations.
JEL Classification Codes: K11, K12, K15, K20.
Downloads
Article Details
Section

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
References
Artemchuk, M., Marukhlenko, O., Sokrovolska, N., Mazur, H., & Riznyk, D. (2024). The impact of economic recession on the financial support of state functions during crisis situations. Theoretical and Practical Research in Economic Fields, 15(2), 350–364. https://doi.org/10.14505/tpref.v15.2(30).15
Barak-Erez, D. (2005). The doctrine of legitimate expectations and the distinction between the reliance and expectation interests. European Public Law, 11(4), 583–601. https://doi.org/10.54648/euro2005045
Baranov, A., Kucher, V., Ustymenko, O., Utkina, M., & Hrybachova, I. (2020). Mechanism of state economic security management in the direction of intellectual property rights protection: Cases of selected industries. Journal of Security and Sustainability Issues, 10(1), 19–34. Retrieved from https://essuir.sumdu.edu.ua/handle/123456789/83135
Bondarenko, S., Bratko, A., Antonov, V., Kolisnichenko, R., Hubanov, O., & Mysyk, A. (2022). Improving the state system of strategic planning of national security in the context of informatization of society. Journal of Information Technology Management, 14, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.22059/jitm.2022.88861
Boone, C. (2018). Legal empowerment of the poor through property rights reform: Tensions and trade-offs of land registration and titling in Sub-Saharan Africa. The Journal of Development Studies, 55(3), 384–400. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220388.2018.1451633
Civil Code of Ukraine. (2003). Law of Ukraine No. 435-IV of January 16, 2003 (as amended). Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/435-15
Council of Europe. (1950). Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. Retrieved from https://www.echr.coe.int/documents/convention_eng.pdf
Council of Europe. (1952). Protocol No. 11 to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, Article 1 (Protection of property). Retrieved from https://www.echr.coe.int/documents/d/echr/Library_Collection_P1postP11_ETS009E_ENG
Cousins, M. (2021). Legitimate expectation and social security law under the European Convention of Human Rights. European Journal of Social Security, 23(1), 24–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/1388262720961792
Cvetkovic, P. (2016). Protection of intellectual property rights under criminal law. Poslovna ekonomija, 10(1), 218–238. https://doi.org/10.5937/poseko1601218c
Dei, M., Kobets, O., Honcharov, A., Tsekhmister, Y., & Shapovalovа, K. (2019). Effectiveness of the program for development of the prosecutor’s ecological and legal consciousness. Asia Life Sciences, 2, 563–576.
Dolgopolova, L. M., Us, M. V., & Glotov, S. O. (2020). Relevant issues of property rights protection in Ukraine. Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics, 11(4), 1137–1144. https://doi.org/10.14505//jarle.v11.4(50).08
Dugeri, M. (2020). The doctrine of legitimate expectation in employment law. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3545135
European Court of Human Rights. (2004). Kopecký v. Slovakia (Application No. 44912/98). Retrieved from https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-66758
European Court of Human Rights. (2003). Stretch v. the United Kingdom (Application No. 44277/98). Retrieved from https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-61173
Haltsova, V. V., Volodina, O. O., Hordieiev, V. I., Samoshchenko, I. V., & Orobets, K. M. (2024). Analysis of criminal law on ecocide: A case study of war in Ukraine. Revista Kawsaypacha: Sociedad y Medio Ambiente, (14), D-013. https://doi.org/10.18800/kawsaypacha.202402.d013
Henckels, C. (2023). Justifying the protection of legitimate expectations in international investment law: Legal certainty and arbitrary conduct. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4416893
Gaman, P., Yarovoi, T., Shestakovska, T., Akimov, O., & Akimova, L. (2022). Institutional platform to ensure the interaction between the subjects of combating medical and biological emergencies mechanism. Economic Affairs, 67(4), 765–775. https://doi.org/10.46852/0424-2513.4s.2022.10
Iasechko, S., Zaitsev, O., Pokusa, F., Saienko, V., & Harashchuk, I. (2022). Legal regulation of intellectual property in sports. SPORT TK-Revista EuroAmericana de Ciencias Del Deporte, 11, 45. https://doi.org/10.6018/sportk.526631
Ibrahim, I., & Israhadi, E. (2024). Legal politics of communal intellectual property rights protection in indigenous communities. In F. Santiago, M. Rachmawati, E. E. Supriyanto, & F. J. Nugroho (Eds.), ICLSSEE 2024: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Law, Social Sciences, Economics, and Education. EAI. https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.25-5-2024.2349488
Ilie, L. (2021). Revisiting the concept of legitimate expectations in renewable energy treaty cases. European Investment Law and Arbitration Review Online, 6(1), 169–188. https://doi.org/10.1163/24689017_0601008
Kaminskyy, V. (2024). The role of e-learning during martial law: The Ukrainian experience. E-Learning Innovations Journal, 2(2), 52–79. https://doi.org/10.57125/elij.2024.09.25.04
Kolichala, H. K. (2020). The doctrine of “Legitimate Expectation” under company law. The Management Accountant Journal, 55(6), 100–103. https://doi.org/10.33516/maj.v55i6.100-103p
Law of Ukraine “On guaranteeing property rights to real estate objects that will be constructed in the future” No. 2518-IX. (2022). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2518-20?lang=en#Text
Lavrov, R., Remnova, L., Sadchykova, І., Mazur, H., Tymoshenko, M., Kozlovskyi, V., & Kozlovskyi, S. (2022). Investments in the sustainable development of the potato sector in Ukraine based on the optimal balance of production and consumption. Wseas Transactions on Business and Economics, 19, 186–196. https://doi.org/10.37394/23207.2022.19.19
Liu, G., Yang, Z., Zhang, F., & Zhang, N. (2022). Environmental tax reform and environmental investment: A quasi-natural experiment based on China’s environmental protection tax law. Energy Economics, 109, 106000. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2022.106000
Lutsenko, D., Sverdlichenko, V., Martyniuk, O., Hura, M., & Meniv, Y. (2025). EVALUATING THE LEGAL REGULATION OF PROPERTY EXPECTATIONS IN THE CONTEXT OF CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS: A SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW. Bangladesh Journal of Multidisciplinary Scientific Research, 10(6), 12-24. https://doi.org/10.46281/bjmsr.v10i6.2590
Mairal, H. A. (2010). Legitimate expectations and informal administrative representations. In S. W. Schill (Ed.), International investment law and comparative public law (pp. 413–452). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199589104.003.0013
McDougal, M. S., Lasswell, H. D., & Chen, L.-C. (2019). The basic policies of a comprehensive public order of human dignity. In Human rights and world public order (2nd ed., pp. 367–448). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/law/9780190882631.003.0008
Melenovsky, C. M. (2020). Conventionalism and legitimate expectations. Journal of Moral Philosophy, 18(2), 108–130. https://doi.org/10.1163/17455243-BJA10061
Piška, N. (2009). Hopes, expectations and revocable promises in proprietary estoppel. Modern Law Review, 72(6), 998–1015. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2230.2009.00778.x
Prokopenko, O. (2022). Digital contracts in renewable energy markets: Challenges and opportunities. Law, Business and Sustainability Herald, 2(4), 17–30. Retrieved from https://lbsherald.org/index.php/journal/article/view/48
Puig, S., & Shaffer, G. (2018). Imperfect alternatives: Institutional choice and the reform of investment law. American Journal of International Law, 112(3), 361–409. https://doi.org/10.1017/ajil.2018.70
Rahman, H. P., Permana, N. A. E., Nissa, V. K., Kartina, R. M., & Andri, G. Y. (2024). Legal protection of intellectual property rights in the context of economic globalization: A case study of copyright enforcement in international markets. Indonesian Journal of Multidisciplinary Science, 3(9), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.55324/ijoms.v3i9.895
Rajput, A., & Malhotra, S. (2019). Legitimate expectations in investment arbitration: A comparative perspective. In M. P. Singh & N. Kumar (Eds.), The Indian Yearbook of Comparative Law 2018 (pp. 297–317). Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-7052-6_13
Romaniuk, M., Orobets, K., Herasymenko, O., Brynzanska, O., & Petkov, V. (2024). The Practice of Qualifying Environmental Crimes at Critical Infrastructure Facilities in the Criminal Justice of EU Countries. Journal of Lifestyle and SDGs Review, 5(2), e02561. https://doi.org/10.47172/2965-730x.sdgsreview.v5.n02.pe02561
Shevchuk, O., Lysodyed, O., Matyukhina, N., Babaieva, O., & Davydenko, S. (2023). Conflict of interest in the activities of judges in Ukraine and the European Union: A comparative legal study. Juridical Tribune, 13(2), 261–282. https://doi.org/10.24818/tbj/2023/13/2.06
Shevchuk, O., & Yarova, A. (2022). Prevention and settlement of conflicts of interest in health care of Ukraine as an administrative legal institute. Juridical Tribune, 12(3), 387–398. https://doi.org/10.24818/TBJ/2022/12/3.0
Skliarenko, I. (2019). The concept, characteristics and types of communal property as a kind of public property. Actual problems of law, 1(2), 77–82. https://doi.org/10.35774/app2019.02.077
Sysoiev, D., Pidbereznykh, I., Mazur, H., Tellis, S., & Vandin, Y. (2024). Administrative law mechanisms for preventing and countering corruption in the field of territorial defence. Sapienza: International Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 5(4), e24069. https://doi.org/10.51798/sijis.v5i4.859
Vicente, M. (2022). Property rights and legitimate expectations under United States constitutional law and the European Convention on Human Rights: Abstract some comparative remarks. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4173176