MECHANISMS OF CREATION AND FUNCTIONING OF CONTEXTUAL SYNONYMS IN NEWSPAPER TEXTS
Main Article Content
Abstract
Newspaper discourse is characterized by high lexical variability aimed at ensuring semantic precision, stylistic diversity, and expressive evaluation of events. However, the mechanisms through which contextual synonyms are formed and function across different topical domains remain insufficiently systematized, particularly in quantitative and discourse-oriented terms. The study investigates the dominant mechanisms of creating contextual synonyms in English-language newspaper texts and examines their functional differentiation in medical, sports, and political discourse. The empirical basis of the research consists of 304 newspaper articles, including 197 medical, 66 sports, and 41 political texts, selected from British mass-market and quality newspapers published between 2021 and 2024. The study employs contextual analysis to establish synonymy within specific micro-contexts, lexico-stylistic analysis to classify the principal lexical and stylistic mechanisms involved in the creation of contextual synonymy, and statistical analysis to quantify their distribution, using semantic, functional, and referential criteria for identification. The results reveal clear domain-specific patterns in the distribution of mechanisms of contextual synonymy. In medical media texts, nominalization is the most frequent mechanism (18%), followed by metaphorisation (15%) and metaphtonymisation (7%), while pronominalisation (10%) and numeralisation (8%) serve to generalize and structure statistical information. In sports discourse, nominalization is likewise dominant (20.8%), accompanied by metaphorisation (8.3%) and periphrastic expressions (8.3%), reflecting the need for precise yet expressive event representation. Political texts demonstrate a predominance of periphrastic nominations for political figures (18%), with negative or neutral political action nominations (15%), geographical terms (15%), and military-situation nominations (13%) forming a substantial share of contextual synonym usage. The findings indicate that contextual synonymy in newspaper discourse is organized through stable semantic–functional–referential overlap and realized through quantitatively differentiated lexical-stylistic mechanisms, with nominalization prevailing in medical and sports discourse and periphrastic nomination predominating in political discourse.
JEL Classification Codes: D83, L82, Z13, Z11.
Downloads
Article Details
Section

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
References
Al Falaq, J. S., & Puspita, D. (2021). Critical discourse analysis: Revealing masculinity through l-men advertisement. Linguistics and Literature Journal, 2(1), 62-68. http://dx.doi.org/10.33365/llj.v2i1.764
Arefyev, N., Sheludko, B., Podolskiy, A., & Panchenko, A. (2020). Always keep your mask on: Transformer based lexical substitution. In D. Scott, N. Bel, Ch. Zong (Eds.) Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING 2020) (pp. 4496–4507). Barcelona: International Committee on Computational Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2020.coling-main.107
Barseghyan, G. (2020). Semantic groups of vocabulary in sports reports. Armenian Folia Anglistika, 16(2), 47-57. https://doi.org/10.46991/AFA/2020.16.2.047
Basile, G. (2022). Synonymy and contextual dependence. In A. Capone & A. Penna (Eds.), Exploring contextualism and performativity (Vol. 30, pp. 41-54). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-12543-0_3
Bosworth, Y. (2023). “Molière amoché”: Discourse on the quality of English-speaking Canadian politicians’ French in Canadian news media coverage of the 2020 conservative leadership debate. Language & Communication, 90, 52-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2023.03.002
Braçaj, M. (2020). The role of linguistic devices in political discourse. Academic Journal of Business, Administration, Law and Social Sciences, 6(1), 17-26. Retrieved from https://iipccl.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/17-26.pdf
Caiani, M., Carlotti, B., & Padoan, E. (2021). Online hate speech and the radical right in times of pandemic: The Italian and English cases. Javnost-The Public, 28(2), 202-218. https://doi.org/10.1080/13183222.2021.1922191
Castaño-Pulgarín, S. A., Suárez-Betancur, N., Tilano Vega, L. M., & Herrera López, H. M. (2021). Internet, social media, and online hate speech: Systematic review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 58, 101608. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2021.101608
Del Tredici, M. (2020). Linguistic Variation in Online Communities: A Computational Perspective. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Institute for Logic, Language, and Computation, Universiteit van Amsterdam. Retrieved from https://eprints.illc.uva.nl/id/eprint/2180/1/DS-2020-11.text.pdf
Gooding, S., Kochmar, E., Yimam, S. M., & Biemann, C. (2021). Word complexity is in the eye of the beholder. In K. Toutanova, A. Rumshisky, L. Zettlemoyer, D. Hakkani-Tur, I. Beltagy, S. Bethard, R. Cotterell, T. Chakraborty, & Y. Zhou (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2021 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (pp. 4439–4449). Mexico: Association for Computational Linguistics. http://dx.doi.org/10.18653/v1/2021.naacl-main.351
Graichen, E. (2023). Context-aware Swedish lexical simplification: Using pre-trained language models to propose contextually fitting synonyms (Bachelor’s thesis, Linköping University, Department of Computer and Information Science). Linköping, Sweden: Linköping University. Retrieved from https://liu.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1767273/FULLTEXT01.pdf
Guo, R., & Sandaran, S. C. (2023). A critical discourse analysis of news discourse in The Times. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 13(1), 968–984. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v13-i1/16241
Lacerra, C., Pasini, T., Tripodi, R., & Navigli, R. (2021). ALaSca: An automated approach for large-scale lexical substitution. In Proceedings of the Thirtieth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI-21) (pp. 3836-3842). Montreal: International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence. https://doi.org/10.24963/ijcai.2021/528
Lazebna, N., & Prykhodko, A. (2021). Digital discourse of English language acquisition. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 17(2), 971–982. Retrieved from https://www.jlls.org/index.php/jlls/article/view/2533
Li, Y., Chen, J., Li, Y., Yu, T., Chen, X., & Zheng, H.-T. (2023). Embracing ambiguity: Improving similarity-oriented tasks with contextual synonym knowledge. Neurocomputing, 555, 126583. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2023.126583
Matamoros-Fernández, A., & Farkas, J. (2021). Racism, hate speech, and social media: A systematic review and critique. Television & New Media, 22(2), 205-224. https://doi.org/10.1177/15274764209822
Mialkovska, L., Sternichuk, V., Petruk, V., Honchar, K., Knysh, T., Panchenko, V., & Yanovets, A. (2023). Contemporary English media discourse: Linguistic, pragmatic, social, and digital aspects. Journal of Interdisciplinary Research, XXXIX, 151–156. Retrieved from https://www.magnanimitas.cz/ADALTA/140139/papers/A_30.pdf
Nicholson, D. N., Alquaddoomi, F., Rubinetti, V., & Greene, C. S. (2023). Changing word meanings in biomedical literature reveal pandemics and new technologies. BioData Mining, 16, 16. https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.06.27.497742
Omarov, T., & Kondrak, G. (2023). Grounding the lexical substitution task in entailment. In A. Rogers, J. Boyd-Graber, & N. Okazaki (Eds.) Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2023 (pp. 2854–2869). Toronto: Association for Computational Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2023.findings-acl.179
Poplavska, N. M., Kaleniuk, S. O., & Smerechynska, V. A. (2023). Sports terminology in mass media texts (functional aspect). Transcarpathian Philological Studies, 2(29), 39–43. https://doi.org/10.32782/tps2663-4880/2023.29.2.7
Qiang, J., Liu, K., Li, Y., Yuan, Y., & Zhu, Y. (2023). ParaLS: Lexical substitution via pretrained paraphraser. In A. Rogers, J. Boyd-Graber, & N. Okazaki (Eds.) Proceedings of the 61st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) (pp. 3731–3746). Toronto: Association for Computational Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2023.acl-long.206
Semak, L. (2020). Semantic-stylistic aspect of contextual synonymy in modern Ukrainian women's prose. Current Issues in the Humanities, 28(3), 77–82. https://doi.org/10.24919/2308-4863.3/28.208743
Semen, H. Y. (2021). Lexical innovation in journalism. Academic Notes of V. I. Vernadsky TNU. Series: Philology. Journalism, 32(71), 198-202. https://doi.org/10.32838/2710-4656/2021.1-2/35
Syrett, K. (2024). Variation by context: The importance of pragmatics and discourse. Language Learning and Development, 20(1), 59–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/15475441.2023.2239783
Mamaraimovna, T. M. (2023). THE NATURE OF SYNONYMY AS A BASIC UNIT OF LANGUAGE VOCABULARY. Finland International Scientific Journal of Education, Social Science & Humanities, 11(5), 2447-2453.
Tsvirkun, T. V. (2020). Lexical means of influence in a political text: The genre of speech. Linguistic and Conceptual Pictures of the World, 1(67), 116–125. https://doi.org/10.17721/2520-6397.2020.1.10
Vainahii, T. (2023). Synonyms in medical terminology: Educational and methodological materials on the discipline "English for medical purposes" for English-speaking foreign students of medical specialties of higher educational institutions. Uzhhorod: Uzhhorod National University. Retrieved from https://dspace.uzhnu.edu.ua/jspui/bitstream/lib/48536/1/Synonyms%20in%20medical%20terminology%202023.pdf
Xiang, R., Li, T., & McLeod, D. (2021). Lexical data augmentation for sentiment analysis. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 72(11), 1405–1420. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24493
Yu, X., & Zheng, H. (2022). A critical discourse analysis of different news reports on the same event: Illustrated with examples from China Daily and The Guardian. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 10(11), 323–333. https://doi.org/10.4236/jss.2022.1011023