Determinants of Choice of Joint Venture Arrangements for International Marketers

  • Ifediora Chuka Uzoma Department of Marketing, University of Nigeria, Nigeria
  • Ugwoke Pius Department of Marketing, University of Nigeria, Nigeria
  • Ifediora Raluchukwu Ifeoma Doctoral Candidate, Department of Educational Administration and Planning, Ebonyi State University, Abakaliki, Nigeria
Keywords: Joint Venture, Strategic Alliance, International Markets, International Marketers.

Abstract

This study investigated the determinants of the choice of joint venture arrangements for international marketers in Nigeria. The study aims at identifying the most significant influences on the choice of joint venture arrangements. The survey research design was used for the study. The study was carried out in South-east, Nigeria. A sample of 50 experienced international marketers was selected for the study using a snowball sampling technique. Data was gathered through the use of a structured questionnaire.. The analysis was done using Principal Component Analysis. Findings reveal that brand name/equity, firm size, market attractiveness, research and development, as well as internationalization strategy are the most significant determinants of the choice of joint venture arrangements which international marketers in Nigeria adopt. The study recommends that prospective international marketers consider these factors before or when seeking an alliance with any foreign company an international markets.

References

Agarwal, S. (1994). Socio-Cultural Distance and the Choice of Joint Ventures: A Contingency Perspective. Journal of International Marketing, 2(2), 63–80

Agarwal, J. P. and Ramaswami, S. (1992). Choice of Foreign Market Entry Mode Form: The Impact of Ownership, Location and Internalization, Journal of International Business Studies, 1st. Quarter, 1-27.

Alvarez, M. (2003). Wholly-Owned Subsidiaries Versus Joint Ventures: The Determinant Factors in the Catalan Multinational Manufacturing Case. Institut d’Economia de Barcelona (IEB)., Working Pa, 1–27.

Asiedu, E. and Esfahani, H.S. (2001). Ownership Structure in Foreign Direct Investment Projects, Review of Economics and Statistics, 83,4, 647-662.

Awadzi, W.K. (1987). Determinants of Joint Venture Performance: A Study of International Joint Ventures in the United States.Ph. D Dissertation, Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, U.S.A.

Beamish, P.W. (1988).Multinational Joint Ventures in Developing Countries.Routledge, New York.

Brouthers, K. and Brouthers, L. (2001). Explaining the National Cultural Distance Paradox, Journal of International Business Studies, 32,1, 177-189.

Brouthers, K., Brouthers, L.and Werner, S. (1996). Dunning’s Eclectic Theory and the Smaller Firm: The Impact of Ownership and Locational Advantages on the Choice of Entry-Modes in the Computer Software Industry, International Business Review, 5,4, 377-394.

Contractor, F.J. and Lorange, P. (1987).Cooperative Strategies in International Business, Lexington Press, U.S.A.

Erramilli, M., Agarwal, S. and Kim, S. (1997). Are Firm-Specific Advantages Location- Specific Too? Journal of International Business Studies, 4th quarter, 735-758.

Gatignon, H and Anderson, E. (1988), “The Multinational Corporation’s Degree of Control over Foreign Subsidiaries: An Empirical Test of a Transaction Cost Explanation, Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, 42, 305-336

Gomes-Casseres, B. (1990). Firm Ownership Preferences and Host Government Restrictions: An Integrated Approach, Journal of International Business Studies, 1st quarter, 1-24.

Guidice, R.M., and Mero, N. (2007). Governing Joint Venture: Tension among Principals’ Dominant Logic on Human Motivation and Behaviour. Journal of Management and Governance, 11(3): 261-283.

Hauswald, R.B.H. and Hege, U., (2006). Ownership and Control in Joint Ventures: Theory and Evidence. AFA 2004 San Diego Meetings. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=302924

Hennart, J. F. (1991). The Transaction Costs Theory of Joint Ventures: An Empirical Study of Japanese Subsidiaries in the United States, Management Science, 37, 483- 497.

Kayo, E. K., Kimura, H., Patrocínio, M. R., & Neto, L. E. de O. (2010). Acquisitions, Joint Ventures or Arm’s-Length Alliances? Analyzing the Determinants of the Choice of Growth Strategy in Brazil from 1996 through 2007. BAR - Brazilian Administration Review, 7(4), 397–412. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1807-76922010000400006

Killing, J.P. (1983). Strategies For Joint Venture Success. Praeger, New York.

Kim, W, and P. Hwang (1992). Global Strategy and Multinationals Entry Mode Choice, Journal of International Business Studies, 1st quarter, 29-53

Kogut, B., and Singh, H. (1988). The Effect of National Culture on the Choice of Entry Mode. Journal of International Business Studies, 19(3): 411-432

Kumar, V., & Subramaniam, V. (1997). A Contingency Framework for the Mode of Entry Decision. Journal of World Business, 32(1): 53 – 72

Lecraw, D. (1984). Bargaining Power, Ownership, and Profitability of Transnational Corporations in Developing Countries, Journal of International Business Studies, Spring/summer, 27-43

Luo, W. (2013). Locational Determinants and Equity-Based Entry Mode Choice in the Forest Sector: the Case of China. (Unpublished) Thesis Submitted for an MSc Degree in Faculty of Agriculture and Forestry University of Helsinki, 1–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/02827581.2014.920908

Majocchi, A., Mayrhofer, U., & Camps, J. (2010). The Choice between Joint Ventures and Non-Equity-Alliances: Evidence from Italian Firms. Proceedings of 36th Annual EIBA (European International Business Academy) Conference, 23. Retrieved from http://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00690216

Madhok, A. (1998). The Nature of Multinational Firm Boundaries: Transaction Costs, Firm Capabilities, and Foreign Market Entry Mode, International Business Review, 7, 259-290.

Makino, S. and Neupert, K. (2000), National Culture, Transaction Costs, and the Choice between Joint Venture and Wholly Owned Subsidiary, Journal of International Business Studies, 31, 4, 705-713.

McConnell, J. J., and Servaes, H. (1995).Equity Ownership and the Two Faces of Debt.Journal of Financial Economics, 39(1), 131-157.

Nakos, G., and Brouthers, K.D. (2002). Entry Mode Choice of SMEs in Central and Eastern Europe. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 27 (1): 47 – 64

Ogbuagu, C.S.A. (1983). The Nigerian Indigenization Policy: Nationalization or

Pragmatism? African Affairs, 82(327): 241 – 266

Oxley, J.E. (1997). Appropriability Hazards and Governance in Strategic Alliances: A Transaction Cost Approach. Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, 13 (3): 387–409.

Padmanabhan, P. and Cho, K. (1999). Decision Specific Experience in Foreign Ownership and Establishment Strategies: Evidence from Japanese Firms, Journal of International Business Studies,30,1, 25-44

Pan, Y. (1996). Influences on Foreign Equity Ownership Level in Joint Ventures in China, Journal of International Business Studies, 1st quarter, 1-26.

Pan, Y. and Tse, D. (2000). The Hierarchical Model of Market Entry Modes, Journal of International Business Studies, 31,4, 535-554

Pla, J. (1999). Filiales y entrada en los mercados internacionales.Factores determinantes, Revista de EconomíaAplicada, No.20, vol. VII, 29-51.

Sornarajah, M. (1992) - Law of International Joint Ventures, Longman, Singapore.

Williamson, O. E. (1975), Markets and Hierarchies, New York: The Free Press.

Published
2019-06-29
How to Cite
Uzoma, I. C., Pius, U., & Ifeoma, I. R. (2019). Determinants of Choice of Joint Venture Arrangements for International Marketers. International Journal of Small and Medium Enterprises, 2(1), 56-62. https://doi.org/10.46281/ijsmes.v2i1.336
Section
Original Articles/ Short Communications