CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY REPORTING: DOES WRITING STYLE MATTER?
This study offers an extension of Harjoto, Laksmana and Lee (2020) by presenting a descriptive comparison of gender differences in writing style, and how they impact the choice of words and the readability of corporate social responsibility (CSR) reports. We examine readability, solidarity, and certainty of CSR reports. We find that female CSR leaders use a writing style that conveys greater solidarity with their audience, thereby making a better connection with the stakeholders. These CSR reports are also more readable than those written by their male counterparts. The attributes of readability and solidarity, but not certainty, are in turn positively related to future CSR performance. In comparison, for CSR reports issued by male signers, we find a writing style that conveys greater certainty, which is in turn positively associated with the firms’ future financial performance. Overall, findings show that writing style of CSR reports is an important issue for both firms and investors to consider.
JEL Classification Codes: M4, Q5, Z1.
Black Rock. (2020). Our 2021 stewardship expectations: Global principles and market-level voting guidelines. New York, New York, USA. Retrieved January 7, 2021, fromhttps://www.blackrock.com/corporate/literature/publication/our-2021-stewardship-expectations.pdf
Bloomberg. (January 20,2021). Biden administration considers reversing Trump’s ESG rule change. Retrieved January 20, 2021, from https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-01-20/biden-administration-considers-reversing-trump-s-esg-rule-change
Coca Cola Enterprises. (2014). Innovating for a Sustainable Future: Our journey in 2013. Corporate Responsibility & Sustainability Report 2013/2014. Atlanta, Georgia, USA. Retrieved January 6, 2021, from https://demo.wikirate.org/files/~176099/241192.pdf
Eagly, A. H. (1987). Sex Differences in Social Behavior: A Social-Role Interpretation. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Gilligan, C. (1982). In a Different Voice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Gunning, R. (1952). The Technique of Clear Writing. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
Harjoto, M. A., Laksmana, I., & Lee, W. E. (2020). Female leadership in corporate social responsibility reporting: Effects on writing, readability and future social performance. Advances in Accounting, 49, 1-14.
IBM. (2012). 2012 Corporate Responsibility Report. Armonk, New York, USA. Retrieved January 6, 2021, from https://www.ibm.com/ibm/responsibility/2012/overview/year-in-review.html
IBM. (2013). 2013 Corporate Responsibility Report. Armonk, New York, USA. Retrieved January 6, 2021, from https://www.ibm.com/ibm/responsibility/2013/
McLaughlin, G. (1969). SMOG grading: A new readability formula. Journal of Reading, 12, 639-646.
PepsiCo. (2008). 2008 Corporate Citizenship Report. Purchase, New York, USA. Retrieved January 6, 2021, from https://pepsico.mediaroom.com/index.php?s=43&item=218
Verizon. (2014). 2014 Corporate Responsibility Supplement. New York, New York, USA. Retrieved January 6, 2021, from https://www.verizon.com/about/sites/default/files/2014_Verizon_Corporate_Social_Responsibility_Report.pdf
Verizon. (2007). Doing the work. 2007 Verizon Corporate Responsibility Report. New York, New York, USA. Retrieved January 6, 2021, from https://www.verizon.com/about/sites/default/files/2007-verizon-corporate-responsibility-supplement.pdf
Copyright (c) 2021 Maretno Agus Harjoto, Jadallah Jadallah, Indrarini Laksmana, W. Eric Lee
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- Authors retain all copyrights. It is noticeable that authors will not be forced to sign any copyright transfer agreements.
- This work (including HTML and PDF Files) is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.