BOARD MEETING FREQUENCY AND PERFORMANCE OF PUBLIC SECTOR BANKS IN INDIA

Keywords: Agency Theory, Board Meetings, Board Committees, Bank performance, Corporate Governance.

Abstract

This paper aims to analyze the effect of the frequency of board meetings on the performance of public sector banks in India. According to agency theory, frequent board meetings may lead to more concentrated monitoring, lowers the agency cost, contributes to more exchange of ideas among the board of directors, and assist them to be more equipped with the information, which ensures better financial performance. This paper investigates this assumption of agency theory on the performance of public sector banks in India. The number of committees, frequency of board meetings, and audit committee meetings are a proxy of corporate governance mechanisms. Return on Assets (ROA) is a proxy of financial performance. The duration of the study is 2015-2019, and secondary data is used. Panel regression is employed to analyze the impact of variables of corporate governance mechanisms on the performance of public sector banks. Our results find no significant impact of any governance variables used in the study on the ROA of the banks. The study makes an original contribution by providing a comprehensive study related to the process and activity of the board and its impact on the performance of banks. The findings of this paper will help examine the board's process and lead to improvement in concern.

JEL Classification Codes: G21, G34, G38.

Author Biographies

Shweta Taluka

Research Scholar, Department of Business Administration, Manipal University Jaipur

Suhasini Verma

Associate Professor, Department of Business Administration, Manipal University Jaipur, India

Jeevesh Sharma

Assistant Professor, Department of Commerce, Manipal University Jaipur, India

References

Adams, R. B., & Ferreira, D. (2012). Regulatory pressure and bank directors’ incentives to attend board meetings. International Review of Finance, 12(2), 227-248. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2443.2012.01149.x

Adams, R. B., & Ferreira, D. (2007). A theory of friendly boards. Journal of Finance, 62(1), 217-250. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2007.01206.x

Ali, A., Alim, W., Ahmed, J., & Nisar, S. (2022). Yoke of corporate governance and firm performance: A study of listed firms in Pakistan. Indian Journal of Commerce and Management Studies, 13(1), 8-17. Retrieved from https://www.ijcms.in/index.php/ijcms/article/view/312

Aldamen, H., Duncan, K., Kelly, S., Mcnamara, R., & Nagel, S. (2012). Audit committee characteristics and firm performance during the global financial crisis. Accounting and Finance, 52(4), 971–1000. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-629X.2011.00447.x

Al Farooque, O., Buachoom, W., & Sun, L. (2020). Board, audit committee, ownership and financial performance – emerging trends from Thailand. Pacific Accounting Review, 32(1), 54-81. https://doi.org/10.1108/PAR-10-2018-0079

Almoneef, A., & Samontaray, D. P. (2019). Corporate governance and firm performance in the Saudi banking industry. Banks and Bank Systems, 14(1), 147- 158. http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/bbs.14(1).2019.13

Al-Jalahma, A. (2022). Impact of audit committee characteristics on firm performance: Evidence from Bahrain. Management, 20(1), 247-261. http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.20(1).2022.21

Aljaaidi, K. S., Bagais, O. A., & Adow, A. H. E. (2021). The Relationship between Firm-Specific Characteristics and Board of Directors' Diligence in Saudi Arabia. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics, and Business, 8(1), 733-739. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2021.vol8.no1.733

Aljaaidi, K., Sharma, R., & Bagais, O. (2021). The effect of board characteristics on the audit committee meeting frequency. Accounting, 7(4), 899-906. http://dx.doi.org/10.5267/j.ac.2021.1.018

Alqatamin, R. M. (2018). Audit committee effectiveness and firm performance: Evidence from Jordan. Accounting and Finance Research, 7(2), 48-60. https://doi.org/10.5430/afr.v7n2p48

Arora, A., & Sharma, C. (2016). Corporate governance and firm performance in developing countries: evidence from India. Corporate governance, 16(2), 420-436. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-01-2016-0018

Andrés, P. D., & Vallelado, E. (2008). Corporate governance in banking: the role of the board of directors. Journal of Banking & Finance, 32(12), 2570-2580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2008.05.008

Boshnak, H. A. (2021). Corporate governance mechanisms and firm performance in Saudi Arabia. International Journal of Financial Research, 12(3), 446. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijfr.v12n3p446

Buallay, A., Hamdan, A., & Zureigat, Q. (2017). Corporate governance and firm performance: Evidence from Saudi Arabia. Australasian Accounting, Business and Finance Journal, 11(1), 78-98. https://doi.org/10.14453/aabfj.v11i1.6

Chou, H. I., Chung, H., & Yin, X. (2013). Attendance of board meetings and company performance: Evidence from Taiwan. Journal of Banking & Finance, 37(11), 4157–4171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2013.07.028

Eluyela, D. F., Akintimehin, O. O., Okere, W., Ozordi, E., Osuma, G. O., Ilogho, S. O., & Oladipo, O. A. (2018). Board meeting frequency and firm performance: examining the nexus in Nigerian deposit money banks. Heliyon, 4(10), e00850. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2018.e00850

Fernandes, C., Farinha, J., Martins, F. V., & Mateus, C. (2018). Bank governance and performance: A survey of the literature. Journal of Banking Regulation, 19(3), 236-256. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41261-017-0045-0

Grove, H., Patelli, L., Victoravich, L. M., & Xu, P. (2011). Corporate governance and performance in the wake of the financial crisis: Evidence from U.S. commercial banks. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 19(5), 418–436. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2011.00882.x

Hanh, L. M., Ting, I. K., Kweh, Q. L., & Hoanh, L. H. (2018). Board Meeting Frequency and Financial Performance: A Case of Listed Firms in Vietnam. International Journal of Business and Society, 19(2), 464-472. Retrieved from http://www.ijbs.unimas.my/images/repository/pdf/Vol19-no2-paper14.pdf

Ioana, A. N. G. H. E. L., & Mariana, M. A. N. (2014). Study regarding the impact of the audit committee characteristics on firm performance. Studies in Business and Economics, 9(2), 5-15. Retrieved from https://magazines.ulbsibiu.ro/eccsf/articole/vol92/921anghel&man.pdf

Khalifa, H. A. M. G., Natoli, R., & Zuhair, S. (2020). The Impact of Board and Audit Characteristics on the Financial Performance of UAE Listed Firms. International Journal of Accounting and Financial Reporting, 10(2), 60. https://doi.org/10.5296/ijafr.v10i2.16481

Liang, Q., Xu, P., & Jiraporn, P. (2013). Board characteristics and Chinese bank performance. Journal of Banking and Finance, 37(8), 2953-2968. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2013.04.018

Mahmoudian, F., & Jermias, J. (2022). The influence of governance structure on the relationship between pay ratio and environmental and social performance. Business Strategy and the Environment, 31(7), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3060

Maraghni, I., & Nekhili, M. (2014). Audit committee diligence in French companies: a question of independence or competence? Accounting Auditing Control, 20(2), 95-124. https://doi.org/10.3917/cca.202.0095

Mayur, M., & Saravanan, P. (2017). Performance implications of board size, composition and activity: empirical evidence from the Indian banking sector. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 17(3), 466-489. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-03-2016-0058

Nguyen, Q. K. (2021). Audit committee structure, institutional quality, and bank stability: Evidence from ASEAN countries. Finance Research Letters, 46(A), 102369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2021. 102369

Nguyen, Q. K., & Dang, V. C. (2022). Does the country’s institutional quality enhance the role of risk governance in preventing bank risk? Applied Economics Letters, 1-4. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2022.2026868

Nguyen, Q. K. (2022). Audit committee effectiveness, bank efficiency and risk-taking: Evidence in ASEAN countries. Cogent Business & Management, 9(1), 2080622. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2022.2080622

Nizam, K., Nawaz, S., Haq, F. U., Saghir, W., & Khan, M. I. A. (2022). Corporate Governance and Firm Performance in Emerging Markets in Pakistan. PalArch's Journal of Archaeology of Egypt/Egyptology, 19(3), 284-302. Retrieved from https://archives.palarch.nl/index.php/jae/article/view/11200

Ntim, C. G., & Osei, K. A. (2011). The impact of corporate board meetings on corporate performance in South Africa. Afr. Rev. Econ. Finance, 2(2), 83e103. Retrieved from https://www. ajol.info/index.php/aref/article/view/86950

Oziegbe, D. J., & Cy, O. O. (2021). Board attributes and firm performance of Nigerian quoted banks with international authorization. International Journal of Economics, Business and Management Research, 5(7), 302-317. . Retrieved from https://ijebmr.com/uploads/pdf/archivepdf/2021/IJEBMR_797.pdf

Rahman, R. A., Ali, F. H. M., & Haniffa, R. (2006). Board, audit committee, culture and earnings management: Malaysian evidence. Managerial Auditing Journal, 21(7), 783–804. https://doi.org/10.1108/ 02686900610680549

Rahman, M. M., Meah, M. R., & Chaudhory, N. U. (2019). The impact of audit characteristics on firm performance: an empirical study from an emerging economy. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 6(1), 59-69. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2019.vol6.no1.59

Saleh, N. M., Iskandar, T. M., & Rahmat, M. M. (2007). Audit committee characteristics and earnings management: Evidence from Malaysia. Asian Review of Accounting, 15(2), 147–163. https://doi.org/10.1108/13217340710823369

Shrivastav, S. M. (2022). Corporate Governance, Audit Committee Characteristics and Firm Performance: Evidence from India. IUP Journal of Corporate Governance, 21(1), 22-36. Retrieved from https://www.proquest.com/openview/695ea2a592c7a6ddb5119cfc78630b92/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=54446

Sobhan, R. (2021). Board characteristics and firm performance: Evidence from the listed non-banking financial institutions of Bangladesh. International Journal of Management, Accounting & Economics, 8(1), 25–41. https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.23832126.2021.8.1.2.1

Thiruvadi, S. (2012). Gender differences and audit committee diligence. Gender in Management, 27(6), 366-379. https://doi.org/10.1108/17542411211269310

Titova, Y. (2016). Are board characteristics relevant for banking efficiency? Evidence from the U.S. Corporate Governance, 16(4), 655–679. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-09-2015-0124

Zahra, S. A., & Pearce, J. A. (1989). Boards of directors and corporate financial performance: A review and integrative model. Journal of Management, 15(2), 291–334. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920638901500208

Zaman, R., Jain, T., Samara, G., & Jamali, D. (2022). Corporate governance meets corporate social responsibility: Mapping the interface. Business & Society, 61(3), 690-752. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650320973415

Zhou, H., Owusu-Ansah, S., & Maggina, A. (2018). Board of directors, audit committee, and firm performance: Evidence from Greece. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 31, 20–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intaccaudtax.2018.03.002

Published
2022-12-05
How to Cite
Taluka, S., Verma, S., & Sharma, J. (2022). BOARD MEETING FREQUENCY AND PERFORMANCE OF PUBLIC SECTOR BANKS IN INDIA. Indian Journal of Finance and Banking, 11(1), 38-44. https://doi.org/10.46281/ijfb.v11i1.1851
Section
Regular Research Article/ Short Communication Article