Impact of the Ownership Structure on the Financial Performance of Banks: Comparative Study between Conventional and Islamic Banks

  • Achraf Haddad Doctor in Financial and Accounting Methods, Researcher at a Laboratory of Finance, Governance, and Accounting, Faculty of Economics and Management of Sfax, Tunisia, University of Sfax, Tunisia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5302-4618
  • Anis El Ammari Associate Professor of Accounting and Finance, Department Head of Accounting, and Finance, Faculty of Economics and Management of Mahdia, Tunisia University of Monastir, Tunisia https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1192-9918
  • Abdelfattah Bouri Professor of Finance, Director of Finance, Governance, and Accounting Laboratory, Faculty of Economics and Management of Sfax, Tunisia, University of Sfax, Tunisia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9122-3829
Keywords: Conventional Banks, Islamic Banks, Ownership Structure, Corporate Governance, Comparative Study.

Abstract

According to the literature of corporate governance, ownership structure is advanced as a non-dissociable mechanism of control intended to follow the stakeholders and especially used by shareholders to monitor the conflicts of interest and the opportunistic behavior of managers. Several previous studies have focused on the impact of ownership structure on financial performance separately in conventional or in Islamic banks. However, the comparative studies between these two impacts are non-existent. In this research, we compared the impacts of this governance mechanism on the financial performance in the two types of banks by using the Ordinary Least Squares method. Data relating to financial performance and ownership structure of banks come from 16 countries. Two samples were collected: the first one included 63 conventional banks, whereas the second one integrated 63 Islamic banks whose data are available over the period (2010-2018). Panel results showed that partial effect of each determinant of ownership structure on each measure of financial performance varied from one banks’ type to another and from one performance measure to another. Besides, the reconciliation of similar models revealed many differences between the same impacts’ signs. Therefore, we concluded that in both banks’ types the ownership structure has a positive impact on the financial performance. While, the negative part of the same impact is less significant in Islamic banks.

JEL Classification:  F33, G20, G21, G24, G30.

References

Alharthi, M. (2016). The determinants of efficiency, profitability, and stability in the banking sector: a comparative study of Islamic, conventional and socially responsible banks. Ph.D. thesis. University of Plymouth.

Al–Rassas, A.H., & Kamardin, H. (2016). Earnings quality and audit attributes in high concentrated ownership market. Corporate Governance, 16(2), 377–399.

Aminul, A., Niki, L., Djoko, S., & Erna, S. (2018). Audit committee characteristics and audit–earnings quality: empirical evidence of the company with concentrated ownership. Review of Integrative Business and Economics Research. 7(1), 18-33.

Badreldin, A.M. (2009). Measuring the performance of Islamic banks by adapting conventional ratios. German university of Cairo. Working paper No. 16.

Beltratti, A., & Stulz, R.M. (2012). The credit crisis around the globe: why did some banks perform better? Journal of Financial Economics, 105(1), 1–17.

Bhagat, S., & Black, B. (2002). The non–correlation between board independence and long-term firm performance. Journal of Corporation Law, 27(2), 231–274.

Batir, T. E., Volkman, D. A., & Gungor, B. (2017). Determinants of bank efficiency in Turkey: Participation banks versus conventional banks. Borsa Istanbul Review, 17(2), 86-96.

Bilal, M., & Abbas, S. (2015). Comparison of Islamic banking and conventional banking: an empirical review. International Journal of Management and Organizational Studies, 4(1), 39-43.

Bozec, Y., & Bozec, R. (2007). Ownership concentration and corporate governance practice: substitution expropriation effects. Canadian Journal of Administrative Science, 24(3), 182–195.

Caglayan, E., & Sak, N. (2010). The determinants of capital structure: evidence from the Turkish banks. Journal of Money, Investment and Banking, 15, 57–65.

Carcello, J.V., Hermanson, D.R., & Ye, Z.S. (2011). Corporate governance research in accounting and auditing: insights, practice implications, and future research directions. Journal of Practice and Theory, 30(3), 1–31.

Carter, R.B., & Stover, R.D. (1991). Management ownership and firm compensation policy: evidence from converting savings and loan associations. Financial Management, 20(4), 80–90.

Chong, B.S., & Liu, M.H. (2009). Islamic banking: interest–free or interest–based? Pacific–Basin Finance Journal, 17, (1) 125–144.

Cornett, M.M., McNutt, J.J., & Tehranian, H. (2009). Corporate governance and earnings management at large US bank holding companies. Journal of Corporate Finance, 15(4), 412–430.

Demsetz, H., & Lehn, K. (1985). The structure of corporate ownership: causes and consequences. Journal of Political Economy, 93(6), 1115–1177.

Dhillon, A., & Rossetto, S. (2015). Ownership structure, voting, and risk. The Review of Financial Studies, 28(2), 521-560.

Emerson, R. (1962). Power–dependence relations. American Sociological Review, 27(1), 31–41.

Fahad, N.U. (2014). An econometric analysis on the financial performance of commercial banks in Bangladesh: a comparative study. Journal of Business Studies, 8, 33–50.

Fahlenbrach, R., & Stulz, R.M. (2011). Bank CEO incentives and the credit crisis. Journal of Financial Economics, 99, 11–26.

Flamini, V., McDonald, C., & Schumacher, L. (2009). The determinants of commercial bank profitability in sub–saharan Africa. Working paper, No. 09/15. International monetary fund.

Gebba, T.R., & Aboelmaged, M.G. (2016). Corporate governance of UAE financial institutions: a comparative study between conventional and Islamic banks. Journal of Applied Finance and Banking, 6(5), 119–160.

Grigorian, D., & Manole, V. (2002). Determinants of commercial bank performance in transition: an application of data envelopment analysis. World bank policy research, Working paper No. 2850.

Gropp, R., & Heider, F. (2010). The determinants of bank capital structure. Review of Finance, 14(4), 587–622.

Gul, S., Irshad, F., & Zaman, K. (2011). Factors affecting bank profitability in Pakistan. The Romanian Economic Journal, 14(39), 61–87.

Gurbuz, A.O., Aybars, A., & Kutlu, O. (2010). Corporate governance and financial performance with a perspective on institutional ownership: empirical evidence from Turkey. JAMAR, 8(2), 22–37.

Hussein, H.A., & Charif, H. (2011). Multiple approaches in performance assessment of UAE commercial banks. International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management, 4(1), 74–82.

Iannotta, G., Nocera, G., & Sironi, A. (2007). Ownership structure, risk, and performance in the European banking industry. Journal of Banking and Finance, 31(7), 2127–2147.

Iqbal, J., Strobl, S., & Vahamaa, S. (2015). Corporate governance and the systemic risk of financial institutions. Journal of Economics and Business, 82(C), 42–61.

Jemric, I., & Vujcic, B. (2002). Efficiency of banks in Croatia: a DEA approach. Comparative Economic Studies, 44(2-3), 169–193.

Jensen, M.C., & Meckling, W.H. (1976). Theory of the firm: managerial behavior, agency costs, and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360.

Kallamu, B.S. (2016). Ownership structure, independent directors and firm performance. E3 Journal of Business Management and Economics, 7(1), 19–28.

Kim, P.K., & Rasiah, D. (2010). Relationship between corporate governance and bank performance in Malaysia during the pre and post Asian financial crisis. European Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Sciences, 21(1), 39–63.

Kraft, E., & Tirtiroglu, D. (1998). Bank efficiency in Croatia: a stochastic–frontier analysis. Journal of Comparative Economics, 26(2), 282–300.

Lang, L., & So, S. (2002). Bank ownership structure and economic performance. SSRN, Working paper.

Macey, J.R., & O'Hara, M. (2003). The corporate governance of banks. Federal Reserve Bank of New York, Economic Policy Review, 9(1), 91–107.

Manthos, D.D., & Nikolaos, I.P. (2009). Determinants of bank efficiency: evidence from a semi–parametric methodology. Managerial Finance, 35(3), 260–275.

Needles, B.E., Turel, J.A., Sengur, E.D., & Asli, T. (2012). Corporate governance in Turkey: issues and practices of high–performance companies. Journal of Accounting and Management Information Systems, 11(4), 510–531.

Onali, E., Galiakhmetova, R., Molyneux, P., & Torluccio, G. (2016). CEO power, government monitoring, and bank dividends. Journal of Financial Intermediation, 27(C), 89–117.

Ozer, B., and Yamak, S., (2000). The role of market control on the relation between ownership and performance: evidence from Turkish market. EFMA, Lugano meetings. Available at: http://ssrn.com/absract=268089.

Rashwan, M.H., & Ehab, H. (2016). Comparative efficiency study between Islamic and traditional banks. Journal of Finance and Economics, 4(3), 74–85.

Rowe, W., Shi, W., & Wang, C. (2011). Board governance and performance of Chinese banks. Banks and Bank System, 6(1), 26-40.

Saeed, M.S. (2014). Bank–related, industry–related and macroeconomic factors affecting bank profitability: a case of the United Kingdom. Research Journal of Finance and Accounting, 5(2), 42–50.

Samad, A. (2004a). Performance of interest free Islamic banks vs interest–based conventional banks of Bahrain. IIUM Journal of Economics and Management, 12(2), 1–25.

Sufian, F., & Noor Mohamad Noor, M. A. (2012). Determinants of bank performance in a developing economy: Does bank origins matters?. Global Business Review, 13(1), 1-23.

Shamsher, M., Hassan, T., & Bader, M.K.I. (2008). Efficiency of conventional versus Islamic banks: international evidence using the stochastic frontier approach (SFA). Journal of Islamic Economics, Banking and Finance, 4(2), 107–130.

Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. (1997). A survey of corporate governance. Journal of Finance, 52(2), 737–783.

Tandelilin, E., Kaaro, H., Mahadwartha, P.A., & Supriyatna, S. (2007). Corporate governance, risk management and bank performance: does type of ownership matter? EADN working paper No. 34.

Thu, N.T.H., Hung, P.M., & Anh, N.T.L. (2016). An empirical study of corporate governance and banks’ performance in Vietnamese commercial banks. SIU Journal of Management, 6(2), 87-114.

Published
2019-12-20
How to Cite
Haddad, A., Ammari, A. E., & Bouri, A. (2019). Impact of the Ownership Structure on the Financial Performance of Banks: Comparative Study between Conventional and Islamic Banks. International Journal of Accounting & Finance Review, 4(2), 50-63. https://doi.org/10.46281/ijafr.v4i2.442
Section
Regular Research Article/ Short Communication Article