EXAMINING THE LINK BETWEEN ENVIRONMENTAL TAX VOLATILITY AND THE SHIFT TO RENEWABLE ENERGY IN UKRAINE
Main Article Content
Abstract
Environmental taxes are increasingly used as fiscal instruments to internalize environmental externalities and finance renewable energy investments. Environmental taxes are increasingly utilized as fiscal instruments to internalize environmental externalities and finance renewable energy investments. This study examines the nonlinear, regime-dependent relationship between environmental tax volatility and the renewable energy transition in Ukraine, aiming to identify stable tax regimes that effectively support renewable energy development. The study employs annual time-series data from the World Development Indicators covering the period 1980-2023. Preliminary analyses include descriptive statistics, unit root tests (ADF and PP), OLS estimation, and non-linearity diagnostics (BDS and CUSUM tests). Ordinary Least Squares results indicate that a 1% increase in environmental tax revenue increases renewable energy transition by 0.8329% (p < 0.01). Markov switching results identify two distinct regimes. Regime 2 records a higher coefficient (0.7812) and stronger persistence (P22 = 0.970) compared to Regime 1 (0.7016; P11 = 0.909). Regime 2 demonstrates lower volatility, higher mean values (0.9337), and a longer duration of approximately 33 years, indicating a stable and sustained environmental tax regime that effectively supports renewable energy transition. Maintaining stable, consistent environmental tax regimes should be the top priority for policymakers to ensure stable, consistent funding for renewable energy investments, build greater public trust, and accelerate the achievement of SDG 7 in Ukraine.
JEL Classification Codes: H2, Q2, Q4.
Downloads
Article Details
Section

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
References
Avagyan, A. B. (2021). Theory of bioenergy accumulation and transformation: application to evolution, energy, sustainable development, climate change, manufacturing, agriculture, military activity and pandemic challenges. Athens J Sci, 8(1), 57-80. https://doi.org/10.30958/ajs.8-1-4
Alper, F. O., Golcek, A. G., & Alper, A. E. (2025). The relationship between environmental taxes and renewable energy in Europe: A pathway to sustainable development?. Encyclopedia of Monetary Policy, Financial Markets and Banking, 2, 405–414. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-44-313776-1.00211-7
Brock, W. A., Dechert, W. D., Scheinkman, J. A., & LeBaron, B. (1987). A test for independence based on the correlation dimension. Econometric Reviews, 15(3), 197-235. https://doi.org/10.1080/07474939608800353
Box, G. E. P., & Jenkins, G. M. (1970). Time Series Analysis: Forecasting and Control, Holden-Day
Chien, F., Zhang, Y., Li, L., & Huang, X. C. (2023). RETRACTED ARTICLE: Impact of government governance and environmental taxes on sustainable energy transition in China: fresh evidence using a novel QARDL approach. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(16), 48436–48448. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-25407-9
Dradra, Z. (2024). Do energy transition and environmental taxation contribute to sustainable development? Evidence from OECD countries. Arab Gulf Journal of Scientific Research, 42(4), 1814–1831. https://doi.org/10.1108/agjsr-05-2023-0195
Engel, C., & Hamilton, J. (1990). Long swings in the dollar: Are they in the data and doFederal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis (No. 52). Discussion Paper. https://doi.org/10.3386/w3165
Fang, G., Yang, K., Tian, L., & Ma, Y. (2022). Can environmental tax promote renewable energy consumption?—An empirical study from the typical countries along the Belt and Road. Energy, 260, 125193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2022.125193
Global Energy Outlook. (2025). Energy and carbon taxation pathways. Washington, DC: World Energy Forum.
Hamilton, J. D. (1989). A new approach to the economic analysis of nonstationary time series and the business cycle. Econometrica, 57(2), 357-384. https://doi.org/10.2307/1912559
Hansen, B. E. (2000). Sample splitting and threshold estimation. Econometrica, 68(3), 575-603. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0262.00124
Jenkins, S. P., Brewer, M., & Cominetti, N. (2025). What Do We Know About Income and Earnings Volatility?. IZA Discussion Paper No. 17808, Available at SSRN. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5199817
Kamalu, K., & Wan Ibrahim, W. H. B. (2024). Towards full decarbonization: does environmental tax and renewable energy matters in developing countries?. Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy, 13(4), 404–419. https://doi.org/10.1080/21606544.2023.2279963
OECD. (2012). Private Sector Development Policy Handbook. Attracting Investment in Renewable Energy in Ukraine. OECD Eurasia Competitiveness Programme, Paris. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/countries/ukraine/UkraineRenewableEnergy.pdf
Pata, U. K., Cevik, E. I., Destek, M. A., Dibooglu, S., & Bugan, M. F. (2024). The impact of geopolitical risks on clean energy mineral prices: Does the Russia-Ukraine war matter? International Journal of Green Energy, 21(9), 2102–2116. https://doi.org/10.1080/15435075.2023.2295867
Rahmane, A., Abdellaoui, O., & Djouadi, I. (2024). Environmental Regulation and Renewable Energies: Evidence from Generalized Panel Unconditional Quantile Regression. Central European Economic Journal, 11(58), 252–268. https://doi.org/10.2478/ceej-2024-0017
Rehman, A., Batool, Z., Ain, Q. U., & Ma, H. (2025). The renewable energy challenge in developing economies: An investigation of environmental taxation, financial development, and political stability. Natural Resources Forum, 49(1), 699–724. https://doi.org/10.1111/1477-8947.12418
Shahbaz, M., Wang, J., Dong, K., & Zhao, J. (2022). The impact of digital economy on energy transition across the globe: The mediating role of government governance. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 166, 112620. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2022.112620
Sharma, R., Sinha, A., & Kautish, P. (2021). Does renewable energy consumption reduce ecological footprint? Evidence from eight developing countries of Asia. Journal of Cleaner Production, 285, 124867. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124867
Sugihyanty, E., & Faisal, A. (2024). Rethinking Tax Systems for Sustainable Development Goals. Sinergi International Journal of Economics, 2(4), 238–249. https://doi.org/10.61194/economics.v2i4.647
Ukraine Energy Report. (2025). National progress towards renewable transition. Ministry of Energy of Ukraine.
World Development Indicators (WDI). (2023). World Bank Group. Retrieved from https://databank.worldbank.org/source/world-development-indicators
World Development Indicators (WDI). (2023). https://databank.worldbank.org/source/world-development-indicators
Xia, L., Liu, Y., & Yang, X. (2023). The response of green finance toward the sustainable environment: the role of renewable energy development and institutional quality. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(21), 59249-59261. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-26430-6
Zhang, Z., & Zheng, Q. (2023). Sustainable development via environmental taxes and efficiency in energy: Evaluating trade adjusted carbon emissions. Sustainable Development, 31(1), 415–425. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2400