WOMEN AT THE TABLE: ASSESSING THE EFFECT OF GENDER DIVERSITY ON FIRM PERFORMANCE

Main Article Content

Imtiaz Chowdhury

Abstract

This study aims to assess the relationship between female representation on corporate boards and firm financial performance in the context of Bangladesh's emerging economy. While global research presents mixed findings on board gender diversity effects, empirical evidence from developing countries remains limited, particularly in South Asian contexts where cultural and economic factors may influence governance-performance relationships differently than in developed markets. This study employs panel data collected from published annual reports of 74 companies listed on the Dhaka Stock Exchange (DSE) spanning the period 2019-2022, utilizing both www.dsebd.org database and individual company websites for data verification. Panel data regression techniques including fixed effect models, random effect models, and Panel Corrected Standard Error (PCSE) models examine gender diversity effects measured through proportion of women directors, binary presence variables, and Blau heterogeneity index on firm performance proxied by return on assets (ROA) and Tobin's Q ratios. The results demonstrate that female board representation exhibits a significant negative relationship with firm performance indicators, with regression coefficients showing deteriorating performance effects as women's board participation increases. Large firms show no statistically significant relationship between gender diversity and performance metrics, while smaller firms demonstrate significant negative impacts when female family members comprise board positions. The conclusion from this empirical analysis indicates that increased female representation in boardrooms may signal negative market perceptions to shareholders in Bangladesh's developing economy context, particularly for smaller firms where family-based appointments are prevalent. The findings of this study suggest that additional governance variables such as director independence, educational background diversity, and professional experience heterogeneity can be utilized to provide more comprehensive analysis of board composition effects on corporate performance.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Section

Research Paper/Theoretical Paper/Review Paper/Short Communication Paper

Author Biography

Imtiaz Chowdhury , PhD Student, Ivy College of Business, Iowa State University, USA

Imtiaz Chowdhury is a PhD student in Supply Chain Management at the Ivy College of Business, Iowa State University, USA. He holds an MBA in Business Analytics and a Master of Accounting from Iowa State University. He also earned a Master of Business Administration (Finance) and a Bachelor of Business Administration (Finance) from the University of Dhaka. His academic background reflects strong interdisciplinary training in supply chain management, analytics, accounting, and finance. His research interests include supply chain analytics, operations management, and data-driven decision-making.

How to Cite

Chowdhury , I. . (2025). WOMEN AT THE TABLE: ASSESSING THE EFFECT OF GENDER DIVERSITY ON FIRM PERFORMANCE. Asian Finance & Banking Review, 9(1), 9-17. https://doi.org/10.46281/asfbr.v9i1.2674

Share

References

Adams, R., Almeida, H., & Ferreira, D. (2008). Understanding the relationship between founder–CEOs and firm performance. Journal of Empirical Finance, 16(1), 136–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jempfin.2008.05.002

Adams, R. B., & Ferreira, D. (2009). Women in the boardroom and their impact on governance and performance☆. Journal of Financial Economics, 94(2), 291–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2008.10.007

Akram, F., Haq, M. a. U., Natarajan, V. K., & Chellakan, R. S. (2020). Board heterogeneity and corporate performance: An insight beyond agency issues. Cogent Business & Management, 7(1), 1809299. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2020.1809299

Baltagi, B. H., Bresson, G., & Pirotte, A. (2003). Fixed effects, random effects or Hausman–Taylor? Economics Letters, 79(3), 361–369. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0165-1765(03)00007-7

Baum, C. F. (2006). Stata Tip 38: Testing for groupwise heteroskedasticity. The Stata Journal Promoting Communications on Statistics and Stata, 6(4), 590–592. https://doi.org/10.1177/1536867x0600600412

Bell, A., & Jones, K. (2014). Explaining Fixed effects: random effects modeling of Time-Series Cross-Sectional and panel data. Political Science Research and Methods, 3(1), 133–153. https://doi.org/10.1017/psrm.2014.7

Biswas, P. K., Roberts, H., & Whiting, R. H. (2021). Female directors and CSR disclosure in Bangladesh: the role of family affiliation. Meditari Accountancy Research, 30(1), 163–192. https://doi.org/10.1108/medar-10-2019-0587

Breusch, T. S., & Pagan, A. R. (1980). The Lagrange Multiplier Test and its Applications to Model Specification in Econometrics. The Review of Economic Studies, 47(1), 239. https://doi.org/10.2307/2297111

Campbell, K., & Mínguez-Vera, A. (2007). Gender diversity in the boardroom and firm financial performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 83(3), 435–451. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9630-y

Carter, D. A., D’Souza, F., Simkins, B. J., & Simpson, W. G. (2010). The gender and ethnic diversity of US boards and board committees and firm financial performance. Corporate Governance an International Review, 18(5), 396–414. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2010.00809.x

Carter, D. A., Simkins, B. J., & Simpson, W. G. (2003). Corporate governance, board diversity, and firm value. Financial Review, 38(1), 33–53. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6288.00034

Darmadi, S. (2010). Do Women in Top Management Affect Firm Performance? Evidence from Indonesia. Corporate Governance, 13(3), 288–304. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1728572

Drukker, D. M. (2003). Testing for serial correlation in linear panel-data models. The Stata Journal Promoting Communications on Statistics and Stata, 3(2), 168–177. https://doi.org/10.1177/1536867x0300300206

Dwyer, S., Richard, O. C., & Chadwick, K. (2002). Gender diversity in management and firm performance: the influence of growth orientation and organizational culture. Journal of Business Research, 56(12), 1009–1019. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0148-2963(01)00329-0

Erhardt, N. L., Werbel, J. D., & Shrader, C. B. (2003). Board of Director Diversity and Firm Financial Performance. Corporate Governance an International Review, 11(2), 102–111. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8683.00011

Gompers, P., Ishii, J., & Metrick, A. (2003). Corporate governance and equity prices. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118(1), 107–156. https://doi.org/10.1162/00335530360535162

He, J., & Huang, Z. (2011). Board informal hierarchy and firm financial performance: Exploring a tacit structure guiding boardroom interactions. Academy of Management Journal, 54(6), 1119–1139. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2009.0824

Joecks, J., Pull, K., & Vetter, K. (2012). Gender diversity in the boardroom and firm performance: What exactly constitutes a “Critical mass?” Journal of Business Ethics, 118(1), 61–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1553-6

Julizaerma, M., & Sori, Z. M. (2012). Gender diversity in the boardroom and firm performance of Malaysian public listed companies. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 65, 1077–1085. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.11.374

Lückerath-Rovers, M. (2011). Women on boards and firm performance. Journal of Management & Governance, 17(2), 491–509. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-011-9186-1

Marinova, J., Plantenga, J., & Remery, C. (2015). Gender diversity and firm performance: evidence from Dutch and Danish boardrooms. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 27(15), 1777–1790. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2015.1079229

Martínez‐García, I., Terjesen, S., & Gómez‐Ansón, S. (2021). Board Gender Diversity Codes, Quotas and Threats of Supranational Legislation: Impact on director Characteristics and Corporate Outcomes. British Journal of Management, 33(2), 753–783. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12517

Munira, S. (2020). Gender diversity and the firm financial performance of DSE listed companies in Bangladesh. Global Disclosure of Economics and Business, 9(2), 89–96. https://doi.org/10.18034/gdeb.v9i2.513

Nguyen, T., Locke, S., & Reddy, K. (2014). Does boardroom gender diversity matter? Evidence from a transitional economy. International Review of Economics & Finance, 37, 184–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2014.11.022

Pesaran, M. H. (2004). General diagnostic tests for cross section dependence in panels. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.572504

Rose, C. (2007). Does female board representation influence firm performance? The Danish evidence. Corporate Governance an International Review, 15(2), 404–413. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2007.00570.x

Ruigrok, W., Peck, S., Tacheva, S., Greve, P., & Hu, Y. (2006). The determinants and effects of board nomination committees*. Journal of Management & Governance, 10(2), 119–148. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-006-0001-3

Singhania, S., Singh, J., & Aggrawal, D. (2022). Board committees and financial performance: exploring the effects of gender diversity in the emerging economy of India. International Journal of Emerging Markets, 19(6), 1626–1644. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijoem-03-2022-0491

Smith, N., Smith, V., & Verner, M. (2006). Do women in top management affect firm performance?A panel study of 2,500 Danish firms. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 55(7), 569–593. https://doi.org/10.1108/17410400610702160

Sobhan, R. (2021). Board Characteristics and Firm Performance: Evidence from the Listed Non-Banking Financial Institutions of Bangladesh. DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals), 8(1), 25–41. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4589504

Vatcheva, K. P., Lee, M., McCormick, J. B., & Rahbar, M. H. (2016). Multicollinearity in regression analyses conducted in epidemiologic studies. Epidemiology Open Access, 06(02). https://doi.org/10.4172/2161-1165.1000227

Zidi, M., & Hamdi, H. (2024). A Panel-corrected Standard Error (PCSE) Framework to Estimate Capital Structure and Banking Performance within the Tunisian Context. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 14(2), 196–202. https://doi.org/10.32479/ijefi.15793