STRUCTURE OF THE PAPER AND MANUSCRIPT SUBMISSION GUIDELINES

Before submission to the journal's editorial staff, please check the Research Misconduct Policies, violating which will result in immediate rejection of the manuscript and possible sanctions against the author.
The authors strongly recommend reading the “Guidelines for Authors and Translators of Scientific Articles to be Published in English” on the European Association of Science Editors (EASE) website, which guides our work.
Ensure that the manuscript presents the academic value and significance of the research and that its originality and practical significance are well described; it contributes to earlier research on the topic.

The author must take a close look at the manuscript requirements. They are not too rigid, but we recommend meeting them. Therefore, we ask the authors to make every effort to meet the requirements, as this will improve the quality of their materials and make it easier for the editorial staff to prepare the manuscript for publication.

Please define the type of the manuscript from the four possible variants and adhere to both the general guidelines and the recommendations specific to the chosen manuscript type.

The following types of manuscripts can be submitted to the journal:

• Research Paper, which is a final report on the finished original experimental study (the structure is Abstract, Introduction, Literature review, Materials and Methods, Results, Discussion, and Conclusions);
• Theoretical Paper, which is devoted to the theoretical study of the problem, which complies with the journal’s scope (the structure is Abstract, Introduction, Theoretical Basis, Results, Discussions, and Conclusions);
• Review Paper, which is a study of a concrete scientific problem, which complies with the journal’s scope and is conducted based on the materials of the scientific publications (the structure is Abstract, Introduction, Literature review, generalisation of the main statements, Discussions, Conclusions);
• Short Communication Paper on the event (conference, seminar, exhibition, issue of an important monograph), which complies with the journal’s scope (the paper is structured by the author on his/her own, but with compulsory reference to the date and place of the event; however, it does not include a big list of references and supplementary materials).

MANUSCRIPT STRUCTURE                      

Manuscript literature and tenses must be structured as Title, Author affiliation with ORCID and E-mail, Abstract, Keywords, JEL classification codes, Introduction, Literature Review, Materials and Methods, Results, Discussions, Conclusions, Author Contributions, Institutional Review Board Statement, Funding, Acknowledgement, Informed Consent Statement, Data Availability Statement, Conflicts of Interest and References. Submitted in a file with a limited size.

TITLE
The title of the manuscript should fully reflect the research topic and its content. It must be short and concrete (not more than 20 words). Besides, it should catch the reader’s interest and be written using the scientific style. It is appropriate to point to the research object or to concretise it using a colon or brackets. It is not recommended to use contractions, but only the commonly known ones.

AUTHOR (AUTHORS)
Here, the author's (authors') first and last name (s) must be written. Authors who use a patronymic or middle name should write only the first.

K. M. Kabir (The symbol K. M. is not accepted; you should write Khan Muhammad Kabir).

The authors whose names are written in the Cyrillic alphabet must be transliterated correctly. Those who need the transliteration can use the website http://translit.net/ua/.
After the authors' names, academic ranks, places of work (university, academic institution, etc., or the organisation to which they belong) (Affiliation), cities, and countries should be written. If the name of the city or country is already used as the author's affiliation, the city and the country should be indicated. The name of the organisation or institution must be indicated, separated by a comma, in the nominative case. This name must be full, without contractions and abbreviations. Also, the authors should provide their e-mail addresses.
If there are several authors, they decide on the order of their mention in the paper title (recommended variant: based on their contributions to the research). The list of authors includes only those who have actually participated in the research and agreed to bear full responsibility for its content. Research funding or participation in paying the article processing charge is not a prerequisite for inclusion in the list of co-authors. While forming the list of authors, special attention should be paid to the principles of COPE (Committee on Publication Ethics).

To align the academic ranks and occupations used in some emerging and developing economies with international standards.

• E-mail ID and ORCID iD URL are mandatory for all authors. Registration Link: ORCID iD URL (https://orcid.org/register)
• Correspondence authors must be mentioned
• A maximum of five authors can be added to the paper.

ABSTRACT

The abstract must fully reflect the paper’s content. It is advisable to use the Passive Voice or to phrase it as “The paper deals with…” or “The study analyses…”. This should be done according to the following algorithm: the first two or three sentences indicate the relevance of the topic means Background…; the aim and object of the study; the methodology (methods) of the study (for theoretical studies – its theoretical basis) are described; the results obtained are characterized, conclusions are drawn from them, and the practical value (if any) is indicated. The main body of the abstract should demonstrate the result.
Every statement must logically follow the previous one. In the abstract of a research paper, it is recommended to include numerical results. The abstract of the review article should indicate the issues under study and, as a result, present the author's summary of the analysis.
The text should be concise and original. It is not appropriate to use sentences from the Abstract in the text of the paper. At the same time, material not included in the paper cannot be included in the Abstract. It is advisable not to cite any sources in the abstract; tables and figures are not permitted.
Non-standard or unusual abbreviations should be avoided, but if important, they should be identified when first mentioned in the abstract.

An abstract must be concise and factual. Please rewrite the abstract to 250 words for this purpose. The abstract should describe the following items in order 1) Research Background………………….. (research background statements/problem statements at the beginning), 2) Purpose of the Research (for example. The study investigates/examines…), 3) Data, Materials, and Methodology (for example. This study employs samples/survey data/time series data of ….), 4) Results (Numerical) (for example, The results show/reveal that ……), and 5) Major Findings (Quantitative Description) (for example, The findings of this study suggest that …, but NO suggestions/recommendations/implications) in an unstructured manner

KEYWORDS
The purpose of keywords is to provide the reader insight into the paper's contents. They should reflect the research area. The number of keywords should be 5-10 on average. There should be no sentences, only words or word groups. If the object of the study is not mentioned in the paper title (including the country or region), it should be added to the list of keywords. There is no need to replicate words from the manuscript title.

JEL CLASSIFICATION CODES
If the author had not been aware of this classification system earlier, they should have consulted it to understand all its sections: http://www.aeaweb.org/jel/jel_class_system.php. The codes indicated by the author should reflect the research area. The author is welcome to use the codes from two or three areas if they are covered in the research.

INTRODUCTION
The introduction should substantiate and explain both scientific issues and the relevance of the research. Also, a problem statement should be provided. The introduction should not be long; the author should avoid using tables and figures.

The aim is to describe the main results in a short and concrete manner (in one sentence), the achievement of which is the purpose of the research. Several intermediate problems can also be mentioned here, the solution of which will ensure that the aim is achieved. The aim should not duplicate the manuscript title.

The introductory paragraph outlines clearly the objectives and motivation for writing the paper. The introduction should provide context for the discussion in the body of the paper and explicitly state the article's purpose. 

The checklist:

• The introduction section should include a justification for the topic's importance.
• The Introduction is a half-page to a page of text devoted to the relevance of the research topic and the formulation of the SCIENTIFIC problem (within which this research is conducted). There is no need for a literature review here. It is not necessary to tell how the research will be conducted, how the article is structured, what the purpose of the research is, and what tasks the authors will solve. But if you have a review or theoretical article, please, after formulating the scientific problem, formulate the purpose of the study here.
• The introduction should include 10 to 15 of the latest references (2020 to 2026) from well-known journals, along with appropriate extracts to motivate the researchers.
• The introduction section should include brief information on methods.
• The introduction section should include the aim/objective.
• The content of each section/chapter of the article is briefly described in the last paragraph of the introduction.

LITERATURE REVIEW
A literature review provides an analysis and generalisation of relevant works (papers, monographs, reports, theses, etc.) that describe the essence of the problem and/or give an understanding of the previous efforts to solve it. The literature review should comply with the research aim (“fitness for purpose”) and represent the results of a critical analysis of the analytical base used to test the research hypothesis.
The literature review must not be limited only to works published in the country where the author lives and works (the problem should be studied globally). In particular, it concerns authors from non-English-speaking countries (they are advised to thoroughly analyse works published in English).
If appropriate, normative legal acts are also analysed.
Only those sources are given and analysed in the paper that are really valuable for the author’s research. The author cannot simply compile long lists of authors and their works related to the issues under investigation. The author cannot take review excerpts from other authors' works and include them in the list of references. When citing, the author is obliged to observe ethical and moral principles.
While conducting a literature review, the author may cite their own publications only to describe the problem, not to inflate the citation count.
It is recommended to conclude the literature review by presenting unresolved issues, identifying contradictions in the results and findings of previous research, justifying the need to continue studies in this area, and selecting the specific topic (direction) for this study.
In the literature review and throughout the paper, references to sources are formatted in accordance with the APA style guide (American Psychological Association).

The Literature review (in a theoretical sense, this is not a review, but a theoretical basis) should include 30-40-50 analysed sources. It should begin with a few introductory sentences. The sequence of the text must be logical (it is not determined by the shelf position of the work mentioned). It should be subordinated to the study's purpose. Do not start each paragraph with a reference to the source, and structure the text so that one paragraph analyses one source. The review should end with 2-3 summarising sentences. Then, the purpose of the study should be formulated. After that, formulate hypotheses (right here, all together, and do not insert text between them). Of course, if you foresee them. As for hypotheses, they must be formulated clearly and unambiguously! They should be clear and not repeat each other. In review and theoretical articles, hypotheses should be stated at the end of the Introduction, after the research objective is formulated.

It is recommended to conclude the literature review by presenting unresolved issues, identifying contradictions in the results and findings of previous research, justifying the need to continue studies in this area, and selecting the specific topic (direction) for this study.

The checklist:

• Is the literature review properly prepared?
• Is primary literature correctly summarised?
• Has the literature review dealt with a similar research topic before?
• Does the literature review show the results of the prior studies?
• Did the Author position himself/herself among the previous researchers?
• Are different options/perspectives from the literature covered in the reviewed article?
• Are the differences with existing studies explicitly identified and documented?
• Does the text include references whenever necessary?
• Have the hypothesis (-es) and conceptual framework come before methods (methodology)? 
• Has the literature review section included 15 to 20 of the latest references (2020 to 2026) from well-known journals?

MATERIALS AND METHODS
The methods (methodology) of the study are presented in this section (commonly known), along with the methodology the author uses in the research, and/or the methodology offered by the author himself is described in a short, concrete manner. If methods and procedures presented are used in other works, the author should cite the original sources.
In this subsection of the theoretical paper, the research's theoretical basis should be described, and relevant theories, perspectives, formulae, and equations should be presented.
If commonly known statistical procedures are used in the paper, the author should not describe their essence; it is sufficient to point them out.

As for a research article, after the hypotheses, there should be a Methods section (the Methods section is not required in a review article and is not mandatory in a theoretical one). Here (in the Methods section), the study's algorithm (procedure) should be described, the primary data for calculations should be provided, or the sources of their acquisition should be indicated. This should be done in line with the academic presentation of the material. The entire text should be carefully worked out here. Variables in formulas must have established designations. They should be explained.

This section is compulsory and should provide a specific description of the Materials and Methods.

The checklist:

• The Method section describes how the study was conducted, including conceptual and operational definitions of the variables used.
• The Materials and Methods section includes a description of the material selection.
• The Materials and Methods section describes the research methods: Participant (Subject) Characteristics, Sampling Procedures, Sample Size, Power and Precision, Measures and Covariates, Research Design, and experimental manipulations or Interventions.
• The article identifies the strengths and weaknesses of the Materials and Methods and its findings.

The Method section describes in detail how the study was conducted, including conceptual and operational definitions of the variables used in the study; different types of studies will rely on different methodologies; however, a complete description of the methods used enables the reader to evaluate the appropriateness of your methods and the reliability and the validity of your results, It also permits experienced investigators to replicate the study, If your manuscript is an update of an ongoing or earlier study and the method has been published in detail elsewhere, you may refer the reader to that source and give a brief synopsis of the method in this section.

Identify Subsections: Dividing the Method section into labelled subsections is conventional and expedient. These usually include a section describing the participants or subjects and a section describing the procedures used in the study. The latter section often includes a description of (a) any experimental manipulations or interventions used and how they were delivered-for example, any mechanical apparatus used to deliver them; (b) sampling procedures and sample size and precision; (c) measurement approaches (including the psychometric properties of the instruments used); and (d) the research design. If the study design is complex or the stimuli require detailed descriptions, additional subsections or subheadings may be warranted to help readers find specific information.

Include in these subsections the information essential for comprehending and replicating the study. Insufficient detail leaves the reader with questions; too much detail burdens the reader with irrelevant information. Consider using appendices and/or a supplemental website for more detailed information.

Participant (Subject) Characteristics: Appropriate identification of research participants is critical to the science and practice of psychology, particularly for generalising the findings, making comparisons across replications, and using the evidence in research syntheses and secondary data analyses. If humans participated in the study, report the eligibility and exclusion criteria, including any restrictions based on demographic characteristics.

Sampling Procedures: Describe the procedures for selecting participants, including (a) the sampling method, if a systematic sampling plan was used; (b) the percentage of the sample approached that participated; and (c) the number of participants who selected themselves into the sample. Describe the settings and locations where the data were collected; any agreements and payments made to participants; agreements with the institutional review board; the ethical standards met; and safety monitoring procedures.

Sample Size, Power, and Precision: Along with the subject description, provide the intended sample size and the number of individuals in each condition if separate conditions were used. State whether the achieved sample differed in known ways from the target population. Conclusions and interpretations should not go beyond what the sample would warrant.

Measures and Covariates: Include in the Method section information defining all primary and secondary outcome measures and covariates, including those collected but not included in this report. Describe the methods used to collect data (e.g., written questionnaires, interviews, observations) and to enhance measurement quality (e.g., assessor training and reliability checks, or the use of multiple observations). Provide information on instruments used, including their psychometric and biometric properties and evidence of cultural validity.

Research Design: Specify the research design in the Method section. Were subjects placed into manipulated conditions, or were they observed naturalistically? How were participants assigned to conditions through random assignment or some other selection mechanism if multiple conditions were created? Was the study conducted as a between-subjects or within-subjects design?

Experimental Manipulations or Interventions: If interventions or experimental manipulations were used in the study, describe their specific content. Include the details of the interventions or manipulations intended for each study condition, including control groups (if any), and describe how and when interventions (experimental manipulations) were administered.

The text size of the formula should be similar to that of normal text. The formula should be placed in the middle, and the serial number on the right. For example:

a2+b2=c2

(1)

RESULTS
Here, empirical or theoretical data obtained during the research process are given. It is recommended to use figures, tables, graphs, and schemes. The interpretation of the results obtained is not provided in this section. Also, results obtained by the authors or other scientists earlier should not be presented.

Further, the main section of the article is the RESULT (in the review article, the main statements are generalised). Here, not only the results obtained (analytics, systematisation, calculations, etc.) should be provided, but also their economic interpretation, explanation, and justification. If hypotheses were foreseen, then give the results of their verification.

The checklist:

• Are the results discussed in detail?
• Is the research problem original and novel?
• Is the reasoning sound?
• Has the Author given the appropriate interpretation of the data and references?
• Do the pieces of information used in the paper come from reliable sources?

In the Results section, summarise the collected data and the analysis performed on those data relevant to the discourse that follows. Report the data in sufficient detail to justify your conclusions. Mention all relevant results, including those that run counter to expectation; be sure to include small effect sizes (or statistically insignificant findings) when theory predicts large (or statistically significant) ones. Do not hide uncomfortable results by omission. Do not include individual scores or raw data, except for single-case designs or illustrative examples. In the spirit of data sharing (encouraged by APA and other professional associations and sometimes required by funding agencies), raw data, including study characteristics and individual effect sizes used in a meta-analysis, can be available on supplemental online archives.

Recruitment

Provide dates defining the recruitment and follow-up periods and the potential subjects' primary sources, where appropriate. If these dates differ by group, provide the values for each group.

Statistics and Data Analysis: Data analysis and reporting the results of those analyses are fundamental aspects of conducting research. Accurate, unbiased, complete, and insightful reporting of the analytic treatment of data (quantitative or qualitative) must be included in all research reports. Researchers in psychology use numerous approaches to data analysis, and no single approach is uniformly preferred, as long as the method is appropriate to the research questions and the nature of the data collected. The methods used must support their analytic burdens, including robustness to violations of the assumptions underlying them, and provide clear, unequivocal insights into the data.

Ancillary Analyses: Report any other analyses performed, including subgroup analyses and adjusted analyses, indicating which were pre-specified and which were exploratory (though not necessarily at the level of detail of the primary analyses). Consider putting the detailed results of these analyses on the supplemental online archive. Discuss the implications, if any, of the ancillary analyses for statistical error rates.

Participant Flow: For experimental and quasi-experimental designs, there must be a description of the flow of participants (human, animal, or units such as classrooms or hospital wards) through the study. Present the total number of units recruited into the study and the number of participants assigned to each group. Provide the number of participants who did not complete the experiment or crossed over to other conditions and explain why. Note the number of participants used in the primary analyses. (This number might differ from those who completed the study because participants might not show up for or complete the final measurement.)

Intervention or Manipulation Fidelity: If interventions or experimental manipulations were used, provide evidence on whether they were delivered as intended. In basic experimental research, this might result from checks on the manipulation. In applied research, this might be, for example, records and observations of intervention delivery sessions and attendance records.

Baseline Data

Ensure that each group's baseline demographic and/or clinical characteristics are provided.

Statistics and Data Analysis: In studies reporting the results of experimental manipulations or interventions, clarify whether the analysis was conducted on an intent-to-treat basis. Were all participants assigned to conditions included in the data analysis regardless of whether they actually received the intervention, or were only participants who completed the intervention satisfactorily included? Give a rationale for the choice.

Adverse Events: If interventions were studied, detail all important adverse events (events with serious consequences) and/or side effects in each intervention group.

Table 1. Table title ..........

Note. 1. Place the table caption in front of the table body and description below the table body. Avoid vertical rules. Be sparing in using tables, and ensure that the data presented in them do not duplicate results described elsewhere in the article. You may resize the tables to fit the page size. 2. Do not accept the image table.

DISCUSSIONS
Here, the results obtained during the research are interpreted. A comparison is made with the results obtained by other researchers.

The Discussion section should include a discussion of the study's results, a comparison with previous work, an explanation of why the authors obtained these results, and an identification of future prospects.

The checklist:

• Does the article assess and critique the findings and/or the statistical analysis?
• Are the findings in the article compared with those of other authors?

After presenting the results, you can evaluate and interpret their implications, especially concerning your original hypotheses. Here, you will examine, interpret, and qualify the results and draw inferences and conclusions. Emphasise any theoretical or practical consequences of the results. (When the discussion is relatively brief and straightforward, some authors prefer to combine it with the Results section, creating a section called Results and Discussion.)

Open the Discussion section with a clear statement of support or non-support for your original hypotheses, distinguishing between primary and secondary hypotheses. If hypotheses were not supported, offer post hoc explanations. Similarities and differences between your results and the work of others should be used to contextualise, confirm, and clarify your conclusions. Do not simply reformulate and repeat points already made; each new statement should contribute to your interpretation and the reader’s understanding of the problem.

Your interpretation of the results should take into account (a) sources of potential bias and other threats to internal validity, (b) the imprecision of measures, (c) the overall number of tests or overlap among tests, (d) the effect sizes observed, and (e) other limitations or weaknesses of the study. If an intervention is involved, discuss whether it was successful, the intended mechanism of action (causal pathways), and/or alternative mechanisms. Also, discuss barriers to implementing the intervention or manipulation and the fidelity with which the intervention or manipulation was implemented in the study, that is, any differences between the manipulation as planned and as implemented.

Acknowledge the limitations of your research and address alternative explanations of the results. Discuss the generalizability, or external validity, of the findings. This critical analysis should consider differences between the target population and the accessed sample. For interventions, discuss characteristics that make them more or less applicable to circumstances not included in the study, how and what outcomes were measured (relative to other measures that might have been used), the length of time to measurement (between the end of the intervention and the measurement of outcomes), incentives, compliance rates, and specific settings involved in the study as well as other contextual issues.

End the Discussion section with a reasoned, well-justified commentary on the importance of your findings. This concluding section may be brief or extensive, provided it is tightly reasoned, self-contained, and not overstated. In this section, you might briefly return to a discussion of why the problem is important (as stated in the introduction), what larger issues, those that transcend the particulars of the subfield, might hinge on the findings, and what propositions are confirmed or disconfirmed by the extrapolation of these findings to such overarching issues.

You may also consider the following issues:

• What are the outcomes' theoretical, clinical, or practical significance, and what is the basis for these interpretations? If the findings are valid and replicable, what real-life psychological phenomena might be explained or modeled by the results? Are applications warranted based on this research? (Note 1)
• What problems remain unresolved or arise anew because of these findings? The responses to these questions are the core of your study's contribution and justify why readers, both within and beyond your speciality, should attend to the findings. Your readers should receive clear, unambiguous, and direct answers. (Note 2)

Note. Number figures consecutively in accordance with their appearance in the text. Place the figure caption and description below the figure body. (Resolution: 300 dpi). You may resize the figures or schemes to fit the page size.

CONCLUSIONS
In this section, the main ideas of the manuscript are presented, and the obtained results and their novelty are demonstrated. The potential practical applications of the results should be outlined, and directions for further scientific research proposed.

The Conclusions should follow this logic: state the study's purpose (First Line), briefly present the results, and indicate the conclusions to be drawn. Do not cite sources in the Conclusions or repeat sentences from the abstract here. Don't start chapters with subsections.

It should provide a neat summary and possible directions for future research.

The checklist:

• This part should include the general summary of the article, its results, and its findings
• This part should include the unique contributions of the paper
• This part should include theoretical and managerial implications and recommendations for practice
• This part should include research limitations
• This part should include suggestions for future research

Finally, check the overall paper

Don't break sections into a bunch of subsections. Captions for figures and tables should be clear and understandable, even when shown in the context of the article. Do not indicate under the figures and tables that this is your (author's) development or your own calculations because it should be so a priori. Column and row names in tables should be clear and complete. Carefully study each sentence, each paragraph, and the entire article.

Patents: Authors may declare any patents related to the published work, either pending or already obtained. The aim of this section is to create a stronger link between research articles and the new inventions they have contributed to. This section is not obligatory, and there is no penalty for not declaring patents, but in most cases, authors benefit from adding any relevant information here.

When declaring patents, please include the patent number and title so interested readers can access the full details.

We strongly recommend against submitting papers for publication before patents have been granted since publication can compromise the patent application process. Published papers will not be removed from journals for patent applications to be filed. This section is not mandatory but may be added if patents result from the work reported in this manuscript.

Author Contributions: Each author is expected to have made substantial contributions to the conception or design of the work; or the acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data; or the creation of new software used in the work; or have drafted the work or substantively revised it; AND has approved the submitted version (and version substantially edited by journal staff that involves the author’s contribution to the study); AND agrees to be personally accountable for the author’s own contributions and for ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work, even ones in which the author was not personally involved, are appropriately investigated, resolved, and documented in the literature. The following statements should be used: Conceptualization, X.X. and Y.Y.; Methodology, X.X.; Software, X.X.; Validation, X.X., Y.Y. and Z.Z.; Formal Analysis, X.X.; Investigation, X.X.; Resources, X.X.; Data Curation, X.X.; Writing – Original Draft Preparation, X.X.; Writing – Review & Editing, X.X.; Visualization, X.X.; Supervision, X.X.; Project Administration, X.X.; Funding Acquisition, Y.Y. Authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Institutional Review Board Statement: In this section, please add the Institutional Review Board Statement and approval number for studies involving humans or animals. Please note that the Editorial Office may request additional information. Please add, “The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Institutional Review Board (or Ethics Committee) of NAME OF INSTITUTE (protocol code XXX and date of approval).” OR “Ethical review and approval were waived for this study due to REASON (please provide a detailed justification).” OR “Not applicable” for studies that do not involve humans or animals. You might also exclude this statement if the study did not involve humans or animals.

Funding: All sources of funding for the study should be disclosed. Indicate any grants you have received to support your research work, and whether you received funds to cover publication costs. Some funders will not refund article processing charges (APC) if the funder and grant number are not clearly and correctly identified in the paper. Authors can enter Funding information separately into the submission system while submitting their manuscripts. Such funding information, if available, will be deposited with FundRef upon final publication of the manuscript.

Please add the following in this section: “This research received no external funding” or “This research was funded by [name of funder] grant number [xxx]” and “The APC was funded by [XXX]”. Check carefully that the details are accurate and use the standard spelling of funding agency names at https://search.crossref.org/funding; any errors may affect your future funding.

Acknowledgements: This section is for recognising any contributions to the paper that do not meet the criteria for authorship. This may include technical support, gifts received, or organisational assistance. There are few restrictions on what should be included, with the primary exception that anyone who meets the author criteria must be listed as an author, not merely acknowledged. Personal acknowledgements (e.g., to family members) are acceptable, and it is recommended to include their full names; titles (Dr., Mr., Prof., etc.) should not be used. This section should be kept relatively short.

Informed Consent Statement: Any research article describing a study involving human participants should include this statement. Written informed consent for publication must be obtained from participating patients who can be identified (including the patients themselves). Please state, “Written informed consent has been obtained from the patient(s) to publish this paper,” if applicable. You might also add “Not applicable” for studies that do not involve humans.

Data Availability Statement: This section provides details on where the data supporting the reported results can be found, including links to publicly archived datasets analysed or generated during the study. (For example, the data presented in this study are available upon request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to restrictions).

Declaration of Generative AI and AI-Assisted Technologies in the Writing Process: During the preparation of this work, the author(s) used Grammarly for proofreading and spell checking since the Authors are not native speakers. All intellectual content, analysis, and interpretations were produced solely by the authors. After using this AI tool/service, the author(s) reviewed and edited the content as needed, taking full responsibility for the publication's content.

Conflicts of Interest: Conflicts of Interest Journal uses the recommendations of the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors about Conflicts of Interest (CoIs) (http://www.icmje.org/icmje-recommendations.pdf):

“A conflict of interest exists when professional judgment concerning a primary interest (such as patients’ welfare or the validity of research) may be influenced by a secondary interest (such as financial gain). Perceptions of conflict of interest are as important as actual conflicts of interest.”

CoIs come in different forms and can affect authors, editors, and publishing staff. Having a CoI does not mean your paper will not be published; however, omitting it could lead to retraction or, at least, re-evaluation. No conflicted third parties should be able to directly influence your research results or have a say in the final version. Conflicts of interest that harm the author as a result of the paper’s publication should also be declared.

Types of CoIs include:

Direct/indirect: This concerns whether the CoI refers specifically to an author (direct) or one of their associates, such as a close colleague or family member (indirect).

Financial/non-financial: Both of these are important. Financial CoIs are concerned with receiving money from people or organisations with a vested interest in the research outcome, holding patents or salaried positions that depend on the research outcomes, or holding shares or other items whose value depends on the research. Non-financial CoIs include benefits to groups the author is associated with, as well as reputational benefits.

REFERENCES
The list of references must be made in alphabetical order. While indicating the source, which was analysed in the source language (not in English), should be indicated first in the source language; then, the transliteration should be made in brackets. It is recommended that it be done with transliteration for English-speaking systems (it is better to use the British Standards Institution's transliteration).
Download the APA citation style guide and formatting style guide.
Non-English scripts (such as Arabic or Chinese). When using the original version of a non-English work, please cite it. According to APA style, the reference list does not use non-Latin alphabets, so the title must be transliterated into the alphabet used in the manuscript. Then, the English translation must be given in brackets.

Please remove any self-citations if any corrections are required in your case.

Please follow APA Reference Style in both the text and the reference list.

Each reference cited in the text must appear in the reference list, and each entry in the reference list must be cited in the text. If the Editor finds any mistakes, the manuscript will be stopped or rejected.

You should be very careful about volume, issue/no, page no, and DOI or retrieved from. DOI should be included for all sources of references whenever available.

Multi Reference: Style warning: Multiple citations should be in correct alphabetical order (as reference list).

NOTES

Note 1. This is an example for note 1.

Note 2. This is an example for note 2.

APPENDICES

Appendix A: The Heading to Appendix A

Appendix B: The Heading to Appendix B

Supplementary Materials
The supplementary materials consist of figures, tables, graphs, schemes, photographs, etc., which are referred to throughout the paper.

PAPER SUBMISSION GUIDELINES

As part of the submission process, authors must check off their submission's compliance with all of the following items, and submissions that do not adhere to these guidelines may be returned to the authors.

1. Research papers should not exceed 6,000 to 10,000 words (for short communication papers, 1,000 to 2,000 words). When calculating the number of words in the paper, the information about the authors, title, abstract, keywords, list of references, and appendices should not be included. The number of sources in the list of references should be determined by the author directly but, on average, be within 30-40. In review articles, this number can be significantly higher. Supplementary materials should not exceed 5 pages. Note that the paper should be submitted in Microsoft Word or a compatible format (.DOC, .DOCX). Tables, schemes, figures, and photographs from other authors should not be used in the paper without their written permission.

2. Tables and Figures:

   This Journal accepts Tables/Figures created by the author’s own work only. Number Tables/Figures consecutively in the order they appear in the text. Tables must be adjustable. Avoid vertical rules. Extremely large tables that span more than one page are unacceptable. Be sparing in using tables, and ensure that the data presented in them do not duplicate results described elsewhere in the article. 

   From now on, a paper in this journal may include up to 20 tables/figures/appendixes.

   In particular, This Journal does not accept any figures/artworks borrowed from others (i.e. output of AMOS, charts, and reports of Statistics Agency), if not created by the author’s own work.

   For Tables: Font in Times New Roman, Font Size in 8 sizes (6 minimum)

   Please remove any image table that should be added to the normal table if any corrections are required. Number figures consecutively as they appear in the text. Place a figure's caption and description below the figure body. A minimum resolution of 300 DPI is required. You may resize the figures or schemes to fit the page size.

   Note. Avoid abbreviating the titles of tables, figures, and equations (e.g., Tab. 1, Fig. 2, and Eq. 3) in captions or running text. Do not write "the table above/below" or "the figure on page 32," because the position and page number of a table or figure cannot be determined until the pages are typeset.
   

3. Page Setting:

   Please set up Default Page Layout: Page Columns to one column, Page Size to Letter (8.5 x 11 inches). NO A4 size, Page Orientation in Portrait, Page Margins Top (1 inch), Bottom (1 inch), Left (0.8 inch), Right (0.75 inch).

   Please set up the Default Paragraph panel: Tabs stop at 0.5 inches to the left for each paragraph; Line Spacing in Single line (before 0 and after 0 spacing snapped); Alignment in Justified alignment; Outline Level in Body text.

   Please set up the Default Font panel:

   For Headings and Subheadings: Font in Times New Roman, Font Size in 10 size and Bold, Capitalise Each Word

   For Main Text: Font in Times New Roman, Font Size in 10 size

   For Tables and Appendixes: Tables: Font in Times New Roman, Font Size in 8 size (6 minimum)

   Please do not apply any style to headings or body text throughout the entire document.

4. No Footnotes, but Endnotes Acceptable:

   This journal does not accept footnotes due to technical problems with online XML publication. Please convert all footnotes to endnotes; otherwise, please incorporate them into the text as appropriate.

5. Screening for Plagiarism Policy:

   The publisher and journal have a “Zero Tolerance on Plagiarism policy. We check for plagiarism using the reviewer check and the plagiarism prevention tool (https://www.turnitin.com).

   Keep a Similarity Index <20% and single-source matches <2%.

   If the Editor finds any mistakes, the manuscript will be stopped or rejected.

6. Grammar checker by Grammarly premium software (www.grammarly.com)

   Grammarly's online grammar checker scans your text for all types of mistakes, from typos to sentence structure problems and beyond

   • Eliminate grammar errors.
   • Fix tricky spelling errors.
   • Say goodbye to punctuation errors.
   • Enhance your writing.

   If the Editor finds any mistakes, the manuscript will be stopped or rejected.

7. While submitting a manuscript to the journal, all contributing author(s) must verify that the manuscript represents authentic and valid work and that neither this manuscript nor one with significantly similar content under their authorship has been published or is being considered for publication elsewhere, including electronically, in the same form, in English or other languages, without the written consent of the copyright holder

8. All authors have agreed to allow the corresponding author to serve as the primary correspondent with the editorial office and review the edited manuscript and proof.

9. The text adheres to the stylistic and bibliographic requirements outlined in the Author Guidelines, found in About the Journal.

10. Please download the links below to see the Journal manuscript template:

    

11. If submitting to a peer-reviewed journal section, the instructions in "Ensuring a Double-Blind Review" have been followed.

PUBLISHING PROCESS

Submission process
To submit, please send a manuscript in MS Word format (.doc or .docx).
Ensure all supplementary materials (tables, figures, equations, and images) are editable. If the editor asks to send editable elements, please do so as soon as possible to start the reviewing process. To prepare your manuscript for submission, please read the Submission Guidelines.
Infringement of Research Misconduct Policies will result in paper rejection and possible sanctions against authors.

Review process
All papers are "Double-Blind External Peer-Reviewed." Detailed information can be found in the Peer Review section.
All authors receive the reviewer’s comments immediately after the manuscript is reviewed. The authors have the opportunity to request a Referee Report, which they receive without revealing the reviewer's identity, and can appeal against editorial decisions by responding to the referees with the authors’ arguments and explanations.

Article Processing Charges (APC)

This Journal is an open-access journal that provides instant, worldwide, and barrier-free access to the full text of all published articles. Publication charges enable the publisher to make the published material freely available to all interested online readers. This charge includes all costs of the peer-review process, systems, typesetting, web publication, and long-term archiving. If this manuscript is accepted for publication, you will be asked to pay an Article Publication Charge to cover publication costs. There is no Article Submission Charge for the Journal. This journal charges the following author fees.

Article Publication Charge: 100 USD (VAT Excluded)

APC Update Notice: For manuscripts submitted on or after July 1, 2027, the APC will be updated to 300 USD 

The Executive Manager will inform you when you can pay the Article Processing Charge (APC) and will provide you with all instructions (payment can be made only upon acceptance for publication).

Note 1: APCs will not be refunded due to an article's retraction.

Note 2: In rare cases where articles are entirely removed after acceptance for publication, we will not refund or credit an APC. This is because the Journal provides publishing services and can recoup this investment only through the article processing charge (APC).

Note 3: The APC will be determined as of the date the article is accepted for publication. 

Proofreading
After the paper is typeset, the publisher will provide the authors of accepted papers with proofs for correcting errors. Only changes to the paper's title, list of authors, or scientific errors will be considered and further approved by the publishing team. The publisher is not responsible for the errors resulting from the authors' oversight. We reserve the right to make the final decision regarding the figures' style and size.

Authors whose first language is not English should ensure their manuscript is written in idiomatic English before submission. Please write your text in good English (American or British usage is accepted, but not a mixture).

If you would like to choose an English Language Editing service, we recommend "CRIBFB Author Service"

Personal Information Use and Protection

Provided personal information:

• contact information (name, e-mail address, postal address, and phone number);
• information about education and professional experience;
• e-mail information;
• information about payment, e.g. credit or debit card numbers;
• comments, reviews, and messages you have posted at our resource;

Publisher may use authors’ personal information to:

• maintain the terms of copyright;
• find, investigate, and prevent security threats, fraud, or other malpractice;
• provide authors with our resources, give them access to our products and services, fulfill orders or transactions, hold research or transactions;
• address authors’ claims, comments, or problems;
• provide technical support;
• provide authors with individual personalised content and services;
• improve the quality of our resources, work out new products and services;
• define and analyse new trends;
• inform authors about all changes and updates to our resources, products, and services.

We may share authors’ information with appropriate agents, representatives, mutual establishments, and organisations for which we are agents or sponsors. This information may be shared only for appropriate reasons, such as when it is important for us in business matters or in accordance with our legal obligations.

"Journal” takes all necessary precautionary measures to protect your personal information from theft, abuse, unauthorised access, disclosure, alteration, and distraction, using appropriate administrative, physical, and technical security measures.

Reporting Guidelines

Authorship Criteria

Order of Authors

Data Sharing and Data Availability Policy

Copyright Notice

Privacy Statement